Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hazi Khan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:44833)
2025 Latest Caselaw 14164 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 14164 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Hazi Khan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:44833) on 13 October, 2025

Author: Nupur Bhati
Bench: Nupur Bhati
[2025:RJ-JD:44833]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20024/2025

Hazi Khan S/o Bugal Khan, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village
Post Sadrau, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer.
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, (Water Resources
         Department), Jaipur.
2.       Tehsildar-Colonization, Tehsil Mohangarh No.2, District
         Jaisalmer.
3.       The Executive Engineer (Irrigation), T.m.c. Division Indira
         Ghandi Nahar Pariyojana, Mohangrah, District Jaisalmer.
4.       The Assistant Engineer (Irrigation), T.m.c. Division Indira
         Ghandi Nahar Pariyojana, Mohangrah, District Jaisalmer.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Priyanshu Gopa
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Digvijay Singh for
                                 Mr. N.S. Rathore, AAG



               HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order

13/10/2025

1. Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate associate to Mr. Nathu Singh

Rathore, learned Additional Advocate General puts in appearance

on behalf of the respondents.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely

covered by the judgment dated 25.01.2016 passed in a bunch of

writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13842/2015

(Gulsher Vs. State of Rajasthan), which has been duly followed

by another coordinate Bench in decision dated 24.10.2017 passed

(Uploaded on 14/10/2025 at 10:33:47 AM)

[2025:RJ-JD:44833] (2 of 3) [CW-20024/2025]

in SBCWP No.11508/2017 (Gemar Singh Vs. State of

Rajasthan & Ors.).

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

owns/possesses land, yet the respondents are not providing

irrigation facilities to the petitioner in view of the litigation, though

he is having interim order in his favour.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents in principal agreed that

the issue is broadly covered, however, apprehended that in guise

of the judgment of this Court, the petitioner is seeking irrigation

facilities to his lands, even when he is not in the command area.

5. Having heard rival submissions, the present writ petition is

disposed of in terms of the following directions given by this Court

in the cases of Gulsher Khan and Gemar Singh (supra), with

further directions that the petitioner shall be given irrigation

facilities only, if, his land(s) fall in the command area.

"(i) The petitioner shall approach respective Executive Engineer of IGNP Department within two weeks from today and furnish documentary evidence regarding their ownership and title of the agriculture lands, which is in their possession.

(ii) The petitioner, who is not having any documentary evidence regarding his ownership and title of the said agriculture land but the dispute regarding title of the said agriculture land is pending either before departmental authorities or before competent courts and stay order is passed in their favour, can also furnish copies of said stay order passed by the departmental authorities or competent courts within two weeks from today.

(iii) The respective Executive Engineer of IGNP Department after verifying the documentary evidence, furnished by the petitioner, or after taking into consideration the stay order passed in their favour by the departmental authorities or competent courts shall consider the cases of the petitioner for inclusion of his names in barabandi for ensuing years strictly in accordance with law.

(Uploaded on 14/10/2025 at 10:33:47 AM)

[2025:RJ-JD:44833] (3 of 3) [CW-20024/2025]

(iv) It is made clear that the petitioner, who is presently getting the irrigation facilities to their agriculture fields, will continue to get the same till next barabandi is fixed by the IGNP Department.

(v) In case land(s) for which the petitioner is claiming irrigation facilities, do not fall in culturable command area, the respondents shall not be bound to provide irrigation facility/barabandi."

6. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J

28-/Devesh/-

(Uploaded on 14/10/2025 at 10:33:47 AM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter