Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhimanyu Singh Chouhan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:49539)
2025 Latest Caselaw 15548 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 15548 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Abhimanyu Singh Chouhan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:49539) on 17 November, 2025

Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2025:RJ-JD:49539]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 22359/2025

Abhimanyu Singh Chouhan S/o Shri Himmat Singh Chouhan,
Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Vpo Chikhali, Tehsil Chikhali,
District Dungarpur, Posted As Teacher (Level-Ist), At Office Of
Chief Block Education Officer, Chikhali, District Dungarpur (Raj.).
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural
         Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Jaipur.
2.       The Deputy Secretary To The Govt., Rural Development
         And Panchayati Raj Department (Elementary Education),
         Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.       The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
4.       The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Elementary
         Education, Dungarpur.
5.       The Joint Director, School Education, Udaipur Division,
         Udaipur (Raj.).
6.       The Chief     Block Education Officer, Chikhali, District
         Dungarpur.
7.       The Chief Block Education Officer, Galiyakot, District
         Dungarpur.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Yashpal Khileree
For Respondent(s)          :     -



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

17/11/2025

1. The petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved of the

initiation of departmental equiry under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan

Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1958 against him and issuance of the

(Uploaded on 19/11/2025 at 01:14:11 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:49539] (2 of 3) [CW-22359/2025]

charge-sheet dated 24.03.2025 (Annex.3) in pursuance of FIR

No.130/2024 of Police Station Rajtalab, Banswara. The alternative

prayer of the petitioner is to stay the proceedings of the

departmental enquiry under charge No.1 till completion of the

criminal trial pending against him arising out of FIR No.130/2024

of Police Station Rajtalab, Banswara.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner while maintaining that the

disciplinary enquiry in question firstly cannot be continued as the

respondent department is having no material in relation to the

delinquency or the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner,

further contended that continuation of such enquiry is bound to

prejudice petitioner's defence in the criminal trial. While relying

upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Capt.

M. Paul Anthony Vs. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. & Anr. reported

in (1999) 3 SCC 679, learned counsel urged that in light of the

principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the

departmental enquiry under charge No.1 cannot continue against

the petitioner, regardless of the nature of the offences alleged.

3. Having perused the memorandum of charges served upon

the petitioner and after considering the law on the subject, more

particularly the judgments cited, this court is of the view that the

departmental enquiry under charge No.1 against the petitioner

deserves to be kept on hold.

4. Accordingly, it is ordered that the departmental enquiry

initiated against the petitioner for charge No.1 under Rule 16 of

the Rajasthan Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1958, in relation to

which the impugned memorandum and charge-sheet dated

24.03.2025 (Annex.3) has been served upon him, shall remain

(Uploaded on 19/11/2025 at 01:14:11 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:49539] (3 of 3) [CW-22359/2025]

stayed till culmination of the criminal trial pending against him

arising out of FIR No.130/2024 of Police Station Rajtalab,

Banswara. After culmination of the trial in the aforesaid case, the

disciplinary authority shall take up the proceedings from the

current stage under intimation to the petitioner and thereafter

proceed in accordance with law. It is made clear that the outcome

of the criminal trial shall not influence the departmental enquiry as

would be proceeded with subsequently and department would be

at liberty to proceed with in accordance with law.

5. The writ petition is disposed of in these terms.

6. No order as to costs.

(FARJAND ALI),J 321-divya/-

(Uploaded on 19/11/2025 at 01:14:11 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter