Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Himmat Singh Lodha vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:48686)
2025 Latest Caselaw 15291 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 15291 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Himmat Singh Lodha vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:48686) on 12 November, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:48686]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                         JODHPUR
            S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1440/2025

Himmat Singh Lodha S/o Hukmi Chand Lodha, Aged About 74
Years, House No 34, Shiv Kutir, Shanti Nagar, Hiranmagari
Udaipur, Rajasthan
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2.       Kailash Mantri W/o Late Chhatar Lal Mantri, 16, Patho Ki
         Magari, Subhashnagar, Udaipur, District Udaipur
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Dilip Vidoya for
                                 Mr. Ram Singh Rawal
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP
                                 Mr. Saurabh Soni for complainant



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

12/11/2025

An application (01/2025) under Section 5 of the Limitation

Act has been filed by the counsel for the petitioner.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is

hereby allowed and the delay in filing revision petition is hereby

condoned.

Heard on criminal revision petition.

This revision petition has been filed against the judgment

dated 12.07.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions

Judge No.3, Udaipur in Criminal Appeal No.67/2023 vide which,

the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the judgment

dated 06.02.2023 passed by the learned Special Judicial

Magistrate N.I. Act Cases No.3, Udaipur, in Criminal Regular Case

(Uploaded on 12/11/2025 at 04:14:18 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:48686] (2 of 3) [CRLR-1440/2025]

No.562/2016 convicting and sentencing the petitioner for offence

under Section 138 N.I. Act has been affirmed. The petitioner was

sentenced to undergo one year's simple imprisonment along with

fine in the sum of Rs.1,36,000/- and in default of payment of fine,

further undergo one month's Simple imprisonment.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

and complainant-respondent No.1 have entered into a compromise

in the spirit of Lok Adalat and the respondent No.2 has received all

the amount from the petitioner and does not want to proceed with

the matter, therefore the sentence of imprisonment awarded to

the petitioner may be set aside. The compromise dated

27.11.2024 arrived in between the parties is placed on record.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 concurs with the facts

stated by the counsel for the petitioner.

I have considered the arguments advanced by counsel for

the parties and perused the compromise dated 27.11.2024.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,

since the parties have settled their dispute and complainant

respondent No.2 has accepted the sum towards full and final

settlement of dispute on the satisfaction of the complainant and in

the light of provisions of Section 147 of NI Act and in view of law

laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S.

Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. reported in 2010 (5) SCC 663, the

sentence awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138

NI Act is liable to be set aside. However, since the compromise has

been arrived at after rejection of the appeal preferred by the

petitioner, a cost of 15% of the cheque amount deserves to be

(Uploaded on 12/11/2025 at 04:14:18 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:48686] (3 of 3) [CRLR-1440/2025]

imposed upon the petitioner in light of the decision rendered by

the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu (supra).

Accordingly, the conviction and sentence of imprisonment

awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act

vide judgment dated 12.07.2024 and 06.02.2023 are hereby set

aside on the basis of the aforesaid compromise subject to

deposition of cost of 15% of the cheque amount. The cost shall be

deposited by the petitioner before the Rajasthan State Legal

Services Authority, Jodhpur within a period of one month from

today. In case, the cost is not deposited by the petitioner before

the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur within the

stipulated period, the revision petition may be listed before this

Court for passing appropriate orders.

The revision petition is allowed in the above terms.

Suspension of Sentence application is also decided accordingly.

Copy of this order be sent to the Rajasthan State Legal

Services Authority, Jodhpur.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J 199-mSingh/-

(Uploaded on 12/11/2025 at 04:14:18 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter