Lata Goyal vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 8979 Raj

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Lata Goyal vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 18 March, 2025

Author: Dinesh Mehta

Bench: Dinesh Mehta

[2025:RJ-JD:14309]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5729/2025

Lata Goyal D/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Goyal, Aged About 34 Years, C/o Ghanshyam Parihar, Uttrada Bass Napasar Dist.- Bikaner Rajasthan. At Present Working At Govt. College Jasrasar Bikaner, Rajasthan. (Assistant Professor Sociology).

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Higher And Technical Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

3. The Commissioner, College Education, Block-4, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur.

4. Nodal Cum Principal, Mangilal Bagari Govt. College Nokha, District - Bikaner.

5. Principal, Govt. College, Jasrasar, District-Bikaner.

                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Dr. Ashok Choudhary
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Deepak Bora



                      JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                     Order

18/03/2025

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner would be satisfied if the competent authority of the

respondents is directed to consider petitioner's representation

expeditiously in light of the judgment passed by the co-ordinate

Bench of this Court at Jaipur in the case of Ram Chaturvedi &

Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No. 1474/2023) decided on 28.08.2023.

[2025:RJ-JD:14309] (2 of 2) [CW-5729/2025]

2. The writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner

to file fresh representation alongwith web-copy of the judgment

rendered in the case of Ram Chaturvedi (supra) and certified copy

of the order instant within a period of two weeks from today.

3. In case, a representation is so addressed, the competent

authority of the respondents shall consider the same in

accordance with law in light of the judgment rendered in the case

of Ram Chaturvedi (supra) preferably within a period of four

weeks of receipt thereof.

4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation(s) has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not

be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

5. The stay application also stands disposed of, accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 12-raksha/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)