Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8697 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 March, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:13440]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5607/2025
1. Ashok Kumar S/o Shiv Ram Parashar, Aged About 40 Years,
R/o Village And Post Harseer, Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur.
2. Malendra Singh Rathore S/o Gopal Singh Rathore, Aged
About 40 Years, R/o Village And Post Bhagwanpura, Via
Pushkar, District Ajmer.
3. Shyam Sunder S/o Chimana Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o
Village Dharola Ki Dhani, Nimbdi Kothariya, Post Nimbdi
Kalan, Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur.
4. Pooja Kihnani D/o Ishwar Lal Kishnani, Aged About 41 Years,
R/o 306-B, Haribhau Nagar (Extension) Pushkar Road,
Ajmer.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
(Panchayati Raj), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. Additional Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati
Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. District Programme Coordinator And District Collector,
Nagaur, Rajasthan.
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Nagaur, Rajasthan.
5. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Bhairunda, District
Nagaur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harsh Gupta.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order (Oral)
11/03/2025
1. Petitioners herein are before this Court seeking a direction to
the respondents to grant seniority, fixation and notional benefits
to them w.e.f. the date of initial appointment as has been given to
their counterparts.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners states that
the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by an order
passed in Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. Vs. The State of
Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12109/2018,
[2025:RJ-JD:13440] (2 of 2) [CW-5607/2025]
decided on 18.07.2018. He submits that the petitioners are
sanguine that, in case they are allowed to file individual
representations qua the grievance raised in the present writ
petitions and the same are considered in light of the aforesaid
judgment, they will be meted out with favorable treatment.
3. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits
of the case, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with
a direction to the competent authority to decide the individual
representations (may file fresh, if not already filed) of the
petitioners, in accordance with law, keeping in view the
observations made in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma (supra),
as expeditiously as possible.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA),J 8-Rmathur-Sumit/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!