Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Madhusudan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:13350)
2025 Latest Caselaw 8601 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8601 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Madhusudan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:13350) on 10 March, 2025

Author: Manoj Kumar Garg
Bench: Manoj Kumar Garg
[2025:RJ-JD:13350]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
             S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1023/2024

Madhusudan S/o Mahendra Kumar, Aged About 43 Years, R/o
11/91, Chopasani Housing Board, Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged At
Central Jail, Jodhpur)
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2.       Brajmohan Yadav S/o Shri Harish Kumar Yadav, R/o Plot
         No. 42, Sector 4F, New Power House Road, Jodhpur.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Talmeez Ahmed
                                 Mr. Abhijeet Gehlot
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Lalit Kishore Sen, PP
                                 Mr. Aman Gaur for
                                 Mr. Amit Kumar Gaur



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Order

10/03/2025

The matter is being heard and decided today itself.

This revision petition has been filed against the judgment

dated 07.02.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions

Judge No.4, Jodhpur Metropolitan in Criminal Appeal No.302/2019

(N.C.V. No.302/2019), by which, the appeal filed by the petitioner

was dismissed and the judgment dated 01.05.2019 passed by the

learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No.2,

Jodhpur Metropolitan in Criminal Original Case No.12/2016 (N.C.V.

No.5854/2016) convicting and sentencing the petitioner for

offence under Section 138 N.I. Act has been affirmed. The

petitioner was sentenced to undergo six months' simple

[2025:RJ-JD:13350] (2 of 3) [CRLR-1023/2024]

imprisonment along with fine in the sum of Rs.1,55,000/-. In

default of payment of fine, the petitioner was sentenced to

undergo one month's simple imprisonment.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

and complainant-respondent No.2 have entered into a compromise

in the spirit of Lok Adalat and the respondent No.2 has received all

the amount from the petitioner and does not want to proceed with

the matter, therefore the sentence of imprisonment awarded to

the petitioner may be set aside.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 concurs with the facts

stated by the counsel for the petitioner.

I have considered the arguments advanced by counsel for

the parties.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,

since the parties have settled their dispute and complainant

respondent No.2 has accepted the sum towards full and final

settlement of dispute on the satisfaction of the complainant and in

the light of provisions of Section 147 of NI Act and in view of law

laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S.

Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. reported in 2010 (5) SCC 663, the

sentence awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138

NI Act is liable to be set aside. However, since the compromise has

been arrived at after rejection of the appeal preferred by the

petitioner, a cost of 15% of the cheque amount deserves to be

imposed upon the petitioner in light of the decision rendered by

the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu (supra).

Accordingly, the conviction and sentence of imprisonment

awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act

[2025:RJ-JD:13350] (3 of 3) [CRLR-1023/2024]

vide judgment dated 07.02.2020 and 01.05.2019 are hereby set

aside on the basis of the aforesaid compromise subject to

deposition of cost of 15% of the cheque amount. The cost shall be

deposited by the petitioner before the Rajasthan State Legal

Services Authority, Jodhpur within a period of one month from

today. In case, the cost is not deposited by the petitioner before

the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur within the

stipulated period, the revision petition may be listed before this

Court for passing appropriate orders. The copy of the compromise

deed is hereby taken on record.

The revision petition is allowed in the above terms.

Suspension of sentence application also stands decided

accordingly.

A copy of this order be sent to the Rajasthan State Legal

Services Authority, Jodhpur.

Record of the trial court be sent back immediately.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 84-GKaviya/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter