Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Renu vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:26901)
2025 Latest Caselaw 2861 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2861 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Renu vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:26901) on 6 June, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:26901]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                          JODHPUR
           S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1676/2025

1.       Renu W/o Jaswant, Aged About 20 Years, D/o Indraj, R/o
         13 Kyd Currently 17 Kyd, Tehsil Khajuwala, District
         Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2.       Jaswant S/o Rajendra, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward
         No. 5 17 Kyd, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
                                                      ----Petitioners
                                 Versus
1.       State     Of   Rajasthan,    Through     Secretary    Home
         Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,
         Jaipur.
2.       Superintendent Of Police, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
3.       Sub House Officer, Police Station Khajuwala, District
         Bikaner (Raj.).
4.       Indraj S/o Govind, R/o 13 Kyd, Tehsil Khajuwala, District
         Bikaner, Rajasthan.
5.       Santro Devi W/o Indraj, R/o 13 Kyd, Tehsil Khajuwala,
         District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
6.       Rakesh S/o Indraj, R/o 13 Kyd, Tehsil Khajuwala, District
         Bikaner, Rajasthan.
7.       Sachdev S/o Harbansh, R/o 13 Kyd, Tehsil Khajuwala,
         District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
8.       Kaluram S/o Laduram, R/o 13 Kyd, Tehsil Khajuwala,
         District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
9.       Mangilal S/o Bhadarram, R/o 19 Dol Rawalmandi, P.s.
         Rawalmandi, Tehsil Rawalmandi, District Sri Ganganagar,
         Rajasthan.
10.      Rajuram S/o Jeeturam, R/o Rawalmandi, P.s. Rawalmandi,
         Tehsil Rawalmandi, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
11.      Sandeep      S/o    Jeeturam,    R/o    Rawalmandi,      P.s.
         Rawalmandi, Tehsil Rawalmandi, District Sri Ganganagar,
         Rajasthan.
                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Mudit Vaishnava
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. C.S. Ojha, PP



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH (VACATION JUDGE)

Order

06/06/2025

1. The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a

direction to be provided with adequate security and protection.

[2025:RJ-JD:26901] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1676/2025]

2. The petitioners, both being major persons, claim to have

solemnized their marriage out of their own free will through a love

marriage. They submit that the marriage was performed against

the wishes of their parents, and thus, they feel a threat to their

lives at the hands of respondent nos.4 to 11.

2. The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

the marriage ceremony performed between them have been

placed on record. The petitioners, who are major and having

solemnized their marriage voluntarily, cannot be denied protection

of their life and liberty, since it is a fundamental right of every

citizen as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

This position has been clearly affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court

in S. Khushboo Vs. Kanniammal [(2010) 5 SCC 600], Joseph

Shine Vs. Union of India [(2019) 3 SCC 39], and Lata Singh Vs.

State of U.P. [AIR 2006 SC 2522].

3. Thus, taking cue from the proposition of law set forth by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in a catena of judgments and in order to

protect the fundamental rights of the petitioners guaranteed under

the Constitution, the prayer made by the petitioners to provide

protection to them deserves to be accepted.

4. This Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction, is not inclined

to examine the legal validity or otherwise of the marriage of the

petitioners and therefore does not render any opinion on the

same. However, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the

petitioners to approach the Superintendent of Police, Bikaner for

ventilation of their grievances.

5. In case the petitioners move any such application, it is

expected from the concerned Superintendent of Police, Bikaner to

[2025:RJ-JD:26901] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1676/2025]

take necessary action, after verifying the facts, to ensure that the

petitioners are not illegally hindered in enjoying a peaceful

married life and their liberty by the private respondents who may

be opposing the marriage. Thus, the petition is allowed.

6. However, it is made clear that this order shall not affect any

civil/criminal proceedings, if any, pending or arising out of the

present matter.

7. The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDEEP SHAH (VACATION JUDGE)),J 195-Love/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter