Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhaya Lal Bhagriya vs Union Of India (2025:Rj-Jd:27173)
2025 Latest Caselaw 10619 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10619 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 June, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Bhaya Lal Bhagriya vs Union Of India (2025:Rj-Jd:27173) on 13 June, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:27173]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11837/2025

Bhaya Lal Bhagriya S/o Shri Fakira Bhagriya, Aged About 32
Years, Resident Of Gomathwara, Sagwara, District- Dungarpur
(Rajasthan).
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                      Versus
1.       Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of External
         Affairs, Government Of India, South Block, New Delhi.
2.       The Secretary, Home Affairs, Government Of India, New
         Delhi.
                                                                   ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)           :     Mr. Gulab Singh
                                  Mr. Tanwar Singh
For Respondent(s)           :     Mr. Rajendra Choudhary



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL (VACATION JUDGE)

Order

13/06/2025

1. The present writ petition has been filed by son of deceased- Shri

Fakira Bhagriya who unfortunately passed away on 21.04.2025 in

London Borough of Brent.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the family of

deceased wishes to perform the last rites of the deceased in India

considering their religion and beliefs.

2.1 He further submits that it is only on 12.03.2025 that the deceased

acquired British citizenship and soon was to apply for Overseas

Citizenship of India (OCI) however, unfortunately on 21.04.2025 i.e.

approximately one month after acquiring British citizenship, he passed

away. submits that due to non-availability of OCI, the respondent

Ministry is not providing NOC for bringing the mortal remains of

deceased to India from UK.

[2025:RJ-JD:27173] (2 of 3) [CW-11837/2025]

2.2 Learned counsel urges that the respondents ought to have

humanitarian approach and grant NOC considering the fact that

deceased was of Indian origin and his family resides in India. Also, the

family of deceased cannot be denied their right to cremate the deceased

as per their rituals and religious beliefs.

2.3 He further submits that the only formality remaining is grant of

NOC from Indian High Commission of London to transmit the mortal

remains to India. He has relied upon a judgment passed by the Delhi

High Court while dealing with similar circumstances in Anthony Watts

Vs. UOI & Anr.; W.P.(C) 11192/2024 (decided on 16.08.2024).

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that as

per the Office Memorandum dated 25.04.2020, issued by the Ministry of

Home Affairs, Government of India, the mortal remains of Indian

Citizens and OCI Cardholders can be transferred to India and, therefore,

the mortal remains of the deceased father of the petitioner cannot be

transported from U.K. to India. Learned counsel for the respondents has

placed before this Court a copy of the said Office Memorandum before

this Court, which is taken on record.

4. I have heard rival contentions and perused the material available

on record.

5. The Delhi High Court, in the case of Anthony Watts (supra), after

considering the submissions, issued direction to the High Commission of

India to give NOC, while observing as under:-

"11. Moreover, from a review of the guidelines issued with regards to transfer of mortal remains, it emerges that there is emphasis on the fact that the deceased should be a person of Indian origin. The fact that late Mr. Watt was a person of Indian Origin has already been confirmed in the present case through documents placed on record.

[2025:RJ-JD:27173] (3 of 3) [CW-11837/2025]

12. In light of the above, the Court finds it to be a fit case to allow the request of the Petitioner and accordingly, the following directions are issued:

(i) The communication dated 29th July, 2024 passed by Consular section, High Commission of India, London, refusing to grant a No Objection Certificate for the transfer of mortal remains, is set aside.

(ii) A mandamus is issued directing Respondent No. 1 to issue a No Objection Certificate to Petitioner's daughter-in-law/ Ms. Sharon Alphonso for transfer of mortal remains of late Mr. Alfi Richard Watts from United Kingdom to Hyderabad."

6. This Court is in agreement with the above observations as

rendered by the Delhi High Court. In the present matter too, the Indian

documents like passport and Aadhar have been placed on record

therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to grant the prayer as sought

for by the petitioner.

7. In view of the above observations, the present writ petition is

allowed. The communication dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure 12) given by

Under Secretary, (External Affairs Minister's Office) denying issuance of

NOC is set aside. The concerned authority/respondents is directed to

issue a No Objection Certificate to the petitioner (son of deceased- Shri

Fakira Bhagriya) for transfer of mortal remains of late Shri Fakira

Bhagriya from United Kingdom to place of residence of the petitioner in

India.

8. All pending application (s), if any, also stand(s), disposed of.

(SUNIL BENIWAL (VACATION JUDGE)),J 338-skm/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter