Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajay Singh And Ors vs State And Ors (2025:Rj-Jd:29472)
2025 Latest Caselaw 2041 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2041 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ajay Singh And Ors vs State And Ors (2025:Rj-Jd:29472) on 8 July, 2025

Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:29472]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11268/2016

1. Ajay Singh s/o Shri Prem Singh, aged 42 years, resident of
Bada Bera, Mandore, Jodhpur.
2. Laxman Singh s/o Shri Sohan Singh, resident of - Laxman
Nagar 'A', Banar Road, Jodhpur.
3. Ajay Kumar s/o Shri Govind Prasad Sharma, resident of -Near
Phoolbagh School, Phoolbagh, Mandore, Jodhpur.
4. Narendra Pal Singh s/o Shri Onar Singh, resident of - 487,
Mohan Nagar-B, BJS Colony, Jodhpur.
5. Narendra Kumar s/o Shri Budh Singh, resident of Panchwati
Colony, Ratanada, Jodhpur.
6. Jaswant Bhati s/o Shri Banshi Lal Bhati, resident of - Raika
Bera, Mangra Punjla, Jodhpur.
7. Smt. Pratibha Kachhawa w/o Shri Kuldeep Gehlot, resident of
Near Phoolbagh School, Phoolbagh, Mandore, Jodhpur.
8. Smt. Khushboo w/o Shri Dharm Singh, resident of - Nagori
Bera, Jodhpur.
9. Mahaveer Singh s/o Jagdish Singh, resident of Bada Bera,
Mandore, Jodhpur.
10. Jitendra Kumar s/o Manik Lal, resident of Amar Chowk, Girdi
Kot, Jodhpur.
11. Smt. Garima Choudhary w/o Manish Choudhary, resident of
Jwala Vihar, Jodhpur.
12. Ram Niwas Choudhary s/o Baga Ram, resident of House
No.51, Parshwanath Nagar-I, Bhadwasiya, Jodhpur.
13. Mohit Dadhich s/o Shri Narpat Raj, resident of - House
No.50,     Jakhar    Bhawan,       Parshwanath           Nagar-I,   Bhadwasiya,
Jodhpur.
14. Shaym Sunder Gehlot s/o Shri Mangla Ram Gehlot, resident
of Chanakya Nagar, Lal Sagar, Jodhpur.
15. Narendra Choudhary s/o Shri Poona Ram, resident of Village
Bilara, District Jodhpur.
16. Deepesh Bhootra s/o Shri Amarchand Bhootra, resident of -
Lohiya Street, Punal Pada, Jodhpur.
17. Ashok Naval s/o Shri Narsingh Lal, resident of 588, Maderna
Colony, Bhadwasiya, Jodhpur.
18. Mohd. Ameen s/o Shri Mohd. Sharif, resident of Mahawaton
Ki Masjid, Jodhpur.
19. Sangeet Vyas s/o Shri Srivallabh Vyas, resident of 23/299,
Chopasni Housing Board, Pal Road, Jodhpur.


                      (Downloaded on 09/07/2025 at 09:46:13 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:29472]                       (2 of 4)                               [CW-11268/2016]


                                                                                ----Petitioner
                                        Versus


1.The State of Rajasthan through the Principal Secretary,
Finance Department (Rules Division), Government of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
2.The       Principal     Secretary,         Medical        &        Health         Services,
Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.The Director, Medical & Health Services, Directorate of Medical
&       Health          Services,          Government                 of          Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
                                                                           ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)             :     Mr. Sher Singh Rathore for
                                    Mr. Narendra Singh Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s)             :     Ms. Anjana Jawa, AGC



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

08/07/2025

Learned counsel for the petitioner`s submits that the

controversy involved in the instant writ petition stands resolved in

view of the adjudication made by a Division Bench of this Court at

Jaipur Bench in DB Civil Writ Petition No.2963/2007 (Gopal

Kumawat Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.), decided on 29th July,

2015, holding thus :

"32. In the present case, no material has been placed before us, nor any plea has been taken in the reply that the probationers, during the period of their probation, do not perform the same duties and responsibilities and are not required to carry out the same functions as confirmed employees.

33. We find the practice of payment of fixed remuneration without any allowances and benefit of

[2025:RJ-JD:29472] (3 of 4) [CW-11268/2016]

increments to the probationers, who were appointed after adopting the regular selection process, on substantive posts, or even after following the selection process on ad hoc basis, as well as all those employees who are appointed on substantive posts, to be wholly illegal and arbitrary, and pernicious practice of forced labour.

34. We find no justification for the State Government, to adopt the practice of paying fixed remuneration to the probationers, which is not prevalent, either in the Central Government, or in any other States in the country. The Government of Rajasthan has adopted this evil practice of forced labour for its employees, taking advantage of the attraction of the Government service. The Notifications dated 13.03.2006, amending the Rules, are thus, declared to be unconstitutional, being violative of Article 14, 16, 21, 23 and 38 of the Constitution of India, and against the conscience of the Constitution of India.

35. The writ petition is allowed. The Notification dated 13.03.2006, amending the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951, and the Notification of the same date i.e. 13.03.2006, amending the Rajasthan Civil Services(Revised Pay Scale) Rules, 1998- Fixed remuneration to probationer trainees, are hereby quashed. The State-respondents are directed to pay the entire differential amount of regular pay scale and allowances to the petitioner, after deducting the amount of fixed remuneration paid to him during the period of probation."

In case, the claim of the petitioners is found to be covered

by the adjudication referred to hereinabove; the petitioners be

also allowed the same benefits.

[2025:RJ-JD:29472] (4 of 4) [CW-11268/2016]

Needless to observe that the rights of the parties would be

governed by the final adjudication on SLP pending before the Apex

Court of the land wherein judgment in the case of Gopal Kumawat

(supra), is under challenge.

In the result, the writ petition is disposed of in the light of

the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court dated 29 th July,

2015, in the case of Gopal Kumawat (supra).

Accordingly, the petitioner is entitled to full salary for the

period of probation; subject to adjudication on the SLP pending

before the Apex Court of the land which would govern the rights of

the parties.

Before conferring actual benefits, it shall be required of the

respondents to procure an undertaking from the petitioners to the

effect that their rights/entitlements shall be subservient to the

fate of the SLP pending before Hon'ble the Supreme Court and in

case the Division Bench is reversed or modified in any manner, he

shall be liable for restitution of any benefits/emoluments so

received.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

74-SanjayS/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter