Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1983 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:29371]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12576/2025
1. Aruna Shekhawat W/o Narpat Singh, D/o Nirbhay Singh
Jhala, Aged About 58 Years, R/o 159 Ramnagar, Jawar,
Zawar Mines, Girwa, Udaipur, Presently Posted At
Government Senior Secondary School, Jhamarkotda,
Kurabad, Dist. Udaipur.
2. Durga Sharma W/o Rahul Kumar Upadhyay, D/o Bhagwati
Lal Sharma, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 11 Vinayak Nagar,
Near Subh Labh Complex, Shobhagpura, Girwa, Udaipur,
Presently Posted At Government Senior Secondary
School, Nurada, Mavali, Dist. Udaipur.
3. Roshan Lal Sargara S/o Ghisu Lal, Aged About 56 Years,
R/o Tehsil Vallbhnagar, Udaipur, Presently Posted At
Government Senior Secondary School, Puriya Khedi
Vallbhnagar, Dist. Udaipur.
4. Ram Lal Kalal S/o Rup Lal Kalal, Aged About 53 Years,
Resident Of Miyala, Kheda, Miyala, Rajsamand Miyala
Deogarh Dist. Rahjasmand, Presently Posted At
Government Senior Secondary School, Madavar Bhim,
Dist. Rajsamand.
5. Shankar Lal Jat S/o Amar Chand, Aged About 54 Years,
R/o Near Main Market Jat Mohhla Mavli Gaon, Mavli, Dist.
Udaipur, Presently Posted At Government Girls Senior
Secondary School, Mavli Goan, Dist. Udaipur.
6. Khemraj Karela S/o Pukhraj Karela, Aged About 55 Years,
R/o Kadela House, Near Water Tank, Gariyawas, Mavli,
Udaipur, Presently Posted At Government Senior
Secondary School, Jewana, Mavli Dist. Udaipur.
7. Sambhu Singh Asoliya S/o Padam Singh Asoliya, Aged
About 56 Years, R/o Kapil Vihar, Bedwas, Udaipur,
Rajasthan, Presently Posted At Government Senior
Secondary School, Hinglat, Arnod, Dist. Pratapgarh.
8. Mahipal Singh Rathore S/o Man Singh Rathore, Aged
About 57 Years, R/o 148, C-Clacc, Pratap Nagar, Udaipur,
Girwa, Udaipur, Presently Posted At Government Office
District Literacy And Continuing Education Officer, Dist.
Udaipur.
9. Mahima Dave W/o Madhukant Sharma, Aged About 50
(Downloaded on 09/07/2025 at 09:48:20 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:29371] (2 of 6) [CW-12576/2025]
Years, R/o H.no.22 Near Choudary Flor Meal, Gayatri
Nagar, Hiran Magari Sector 5 Dist. Udaipur, Presently
Posted At Government Senior Secondary School,
Vijanwas, Mavli District Udaipur.
10. Devilal Garg S/o Doluat Ram, Aged About 56 Years, R/o
Quarter No.3 Type 9, Model Public Residential School
Dhikli, Udaipur, Presently Posted At Government Senior
Secondary School, Mangthla, Tehsil Mavli, Dist. Udaipur.
11. Sapana Modi W/o Chatar Singh Bhansali, D/o Jayanti Lal
Modi, Aged About 57 Years, R/o 18 Mehta Ji Ki Badi Sagas
Ji Road, Udaipur, At Persent R/o Near Hotel Maan,
Presently Posted At Government Senior Secondary
School, Vijanwas, Mavali, Dist. Udaipur.
12. Pushpa Asoliya W/o Sambhu Singh Asoliya, Aged About
53 Years, R/o 4, Kapil Vihar, Bedwas, Udaipur, Presently
Posted At Government Senior Secondary School,
Veerdholiya, Mavli Dist. Udaipur.
13. Ramesh Lal Bunkar S/o Khemraj, Aged About 55 Years,
R/o Khuma Ji, Bandoli, Udaipur, At Presently Government
Senior Secondary School, Kejad Sarada, Dist. Salumbar.
14. Mohan Lal Suthar S/o Chunni Lal Suthar, Aged About 55
Years, R/o Ward No 10, Holi Chok Road, Sarada, Dist.
Udaipur, At Present Swami Vivekanand Government Modal
School, Sarada, Udaipur.
15. Neeta Vyas D/o Chandra Narayan Vyas, W/o Naresh
Paneri, Aged About 53 Years, R/o 16, Pushpanjli Vihar,
Tekri- Madri Link Road, Udaipur. At Present Model Public
Residential School, Dhikli, Badgaon, Udaipur.
16. Anil Kumar Dasora S/o Purushottam Lal Dasora, Aged
About 59 Years, Rf/o L-2/23, Jai Shree Colony, Dhulkot,
Girwa, Udaipur, At Present Government Senior Secondary
School, Kailashpuri, Badgaon, Udaipur.
17. Pawan Singh Panwar S/o Jagat Singh Panwar, Aged About
51 Years, R/o Gorana, Udaipur, Presently Posted At
Government Upper Primary School, Pipaliya, Dist.
Udaipur.
18. Bhagwati Lal Pandya S/o Rodi Ram Panyiya, Aged About
51 Years, R/o Gogla, Po Jhadol (P) Udaipur, Presently
Posted At Posted At Government Upper Primary School,
(Downloaded on 09/07/2025 at 09:48:20 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:29371] (3 of 6) [CW-12576/2025]
Sultan Ji, Kakhekhada, Dist. Udaipur.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of
School Education, Government Secretariat Building,
Jaipur.
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of
Sanskrit Education, Government Secretariat Building,
Jaipur.
3. Department Of Finance, Through Secretary Finance,
Government Secretariat Building, Jaipur.
4. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.
5. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner.
6. Deputy Director, Education Department, Udaipur.
7. Joint Director, Education Department, Udaipur.
8. Deputy Director, Education Department, Salumber.
9. Joint Director, Education Department, Salumber.
10. Deputy Director, Education Department, Pratapgarh.
11. Joint Director, Education Department, Pratapgarh.
12. Deputy Director, Education Department, Rajsamand.
13. Joint Director, Education Department, Rajsamand.
14. Divisional Sanskrit Education Officer, Udaipur Division,
Udaipur.
15. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Udaipur.
16. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Udaipur.
17. Divisional Sanskrit Education Officer, Udaipur Division,
Udaipur.
18. District Education Officer, Secondary Education,
Pratapgarh.
19. District Education Officer, Elementary Education,
Pratapgarh.
20. Divisional Sanskrit Education Officer, Udaipur Division,
Salumber.
21. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Salumber.
22. District Education Officer, Elementary Education,
Salumber.
(Downloaded on 09/07/2025 at 09:48:20 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:29371] (4 of 6) [CW-12576/2025]
23. Divisional Sanskrit Education Officer, Udaipur Division,
Rajsamand.
24. District Education Officer, Secondary Education,
Rajasmand.
25. Distrit Education Officer, Elementary, Education,
Rajsamand.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anjali Gehlot
Ms. Deepika Soni
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
08/07/2025
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by
judgment rendered by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B.
Civil Writ Petition No.3534/2009 Yogesh Kumar Pareek vs.
The State of Rajasthan & Ors. decided on 20.01.2014 in the
following terms:
"Petitioner is aggrieved by denial of salary of summer vacation and shifting of date of increment and other benefits.
It is stated that petitioner was appointed on regular basis on the post of Teacher vide order dated 24.01.1992. After joining on 28.01.1992, petitioner was entitled for benefit of service and salary for summer vacation. Respondents denied aforesaid benefit and increment was shifted to the month of March despite of joining of petitioner in the month of January. Accordingly, the respondents be directed to pay salary of summer vacation and also the date of increment be made to January, 1993.
[2025:RJ-JD:29371] (5 of 6) [CW-12576/2025]
The officer-in-charge of the respondents could not justify the action of the respondents, inasmuch as Circular dated 28.07.2003 clarified that if employee has been appointed on regular basis on probation then he would be entitled for salary of summer vacation even if appointment is after 31st December. No justification is given by the respondents for denial of benefit of increment from January other than erroneously correlating it with the benefit of selection scale and thereby, shifting it by 48 days. I find the action of respondents is illegal, inasmuch as the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of salary of summer vacation as he is covered by the Circular. The petitioner should be given increment counting his service from the date of joining and not by shifting it to the month of March.
Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and consequential benefit would be given to the petitioner as referred above. He would be entitled to other benefits based on appointment order dated 24.01.1992 and his joining on 28.01.1992, thus benefit of selection scale would also be determined.
This also disposes of stay application."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the petitioners
may be permitted to file an appropriate representation in light of
the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Yogesh
Kumar Pareek (Supra) for redressal of their grievances.
3. In view of the submission made, the present writ petition is
disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate
representation for redressal of their grievances before the
respondents, and the respondents are directed to decide the same
within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such
representation, strictly in accordance with law, keeping in mind
[2025:RJ-JD:29371] (6 of 6) [CW-12576/2025]
the directions issued by this Court in the case of Yogesh Kumar
Pareek (Supra).
4. It is made clear that the respondents will be at liberty to
examine the representation so filed by the petitioners
independently, and if the case of the petitioners is squarely
covered by the judgment rendered in the case of Yogesh Kumar
Pareek (Supra), the same benefit shall be extended; otherwise
the respondents will be free to examine the case of the petitioners
on its own merits and pass a speaking order.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
19-Payal/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!