Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1612 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:28312]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1871/2025
1. Lalita Kumari D/o Shri Ganesh Ram, Aged About 25
Years, Resident Of Meghwalo Ka Bas Balana Tehsil
Sumerpur District Pali
2. Papiyaram S/o Shri Duda Ram, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Hanuman Colony Harji Tehsil Ahore District
Jalore
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajsathan, Through Secretary Department Of
Home Affairs Govt Secretariat Jaipur
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Jalore
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Pali
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Ahore
5. Station House Officer, Police Station Pali
6. Bhanwarlal S/o Shri Ganesha Ram Meghwal, Resident Of
Village Balana Tehsil Sheoganj District Pali Rajasthan
7. Shankarlal S/o Shri Poonaji Meghwal, Resident Of
Sanderao District Pali Rajasthan
8. Tara Ram S/o Shri Sawaji Meghwal, Resident Of Village
Sanwada Tehsil Ahore District Jalore Rajasthan
9. Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Dadu Ram Meghwal, Resident Of
Village Balana Tehsil Sheoganj District Pali Rajasthan
10. Talsa Ram S/o Shri Prabhuji Meghwal, Resident Of Village
Bithuda Tehsil Ahore District Jalore Rajasthan
11. Khangara Ram S/o Shri Prabhuji Meghwal, Resident Of
Village Bithuda Tehsil Ahore District Jalore Rajasthan
12. Ashok S/o Shri Saka Ram Meghwal, Resident Of Village
Balana Tehsil Sheoganj District Pali Rajasthan
13. Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Mohanlal Meghwal, Resident Of
Village Harji Tehsil Ahore District Jalore
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Khushboo Palasiya
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Chandawat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order 01/07/2025
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
[2025:RJ-JD:28312] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1871/2025]
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522,
the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 112-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!