Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1609 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:28293]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1884/2025
1. Krishna Kumari Dangi W/o Shri Madan Lal Dangi, Aged
About 18 Years, D/o Bherulal Dangi, R/o Village
Langanch, Tehsil And P.s. Kapasan, District Chittorgarh.
2. Madan Lal Dangi S/o Shri Ratan Lal Dangi, Aged About 22
Years, R/o Village Orvadiya, Tehsil Badi Sadari, District
Chittorgarh.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Chittorgarh.
3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Kapasan, District
Chittorgarh.
4. Bheru Lal S/o Bhagirath Dangi, R/o Village Langanch,
Tehsil And P.s. Kapasan, District Chittorgarh.
5. Fuli Bai W/o Bheru Lal, R/o Village Langanch, Tehsil And
P.s. Kapasan, District Chittorgarh.
6. Prakash S/o Dalchand, R/o Village Orvadiya, Tehsil Badi
Sadari, District Chittorgarh.
7. Kanhaiya Lal S/o Bheru Lal, R/o Village Langanch, Tehsil
And P.s. Kapasan, District Chittorgarh.
8. Ratan Lal S/o Moti Lal Dangi, R/o Amrana, Shambhupura,
District Chittorgarh.
9. Ramlal S/o Unknown, R/o Village Ratanpur, Nikum.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ansarul
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Chandawat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
01/07/2025
[2025:RJ-JD:28293] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1884/2025]
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the
prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 217-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!