Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1580 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:28289]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1879/2025
1. Sanjana Vishnoi D/o Bardi Chandr Vishnoi, Aged About 19
Years, Resident Of Vishnoi Mohalla, Dariba, District
Bhilwara (Raj.).
2. Sandeep Vishnoi S/o Ramesh Chand Vishnoi, Aged About
24 Years, Resident Of Bajrang Pura, Gavn Pur District
Bhilwara (Raj.).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of
Home Affairs, Jaipur(Raj.)
2. Superintendent Of Police, District Bhilwara Rajasthan
3. Sho, Police Station Pur, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
4. Bardi Chandr Vishnoi S/o Chittar Vishnoi, Resident Of
Vishnoi Mohalla, Dariba, District Bhilwara.
5. Godavari Devi W/o Bardi Chandr Vishnoi, Resident Of
Vishnoi Mohalla, Dariba, District Bhilwara.
6. Chittar Vishnoi Father/o Bheru Lal, Resident Of Vishnoi
Mohalla, Dariba, District Bhilwara.
7. Bali Devi W/o Chittar Vishnoi, Resident Of Vishnoi
Mohalla, Dariba, District Bhilwara.
8. Gopal Vishnoi S/o Chittar Vishnoi, Resident Of Vishnoi
Mohalla, Dariba, District Bhilwara.
9. Shushila Devi D/o Gopal Vishnoi, Resident Of Vishnoi
Mohalla, Dariba, District Bhilwara.
10. Kanhaiya Vishnoi S/o Bardi Chandr Vishnoi, Resident Of
Vishnoi Mohalla, Dariba, District Bhilwara.
11. Radha Vishnoi D/o Bardi Chandr Vishnoi, Resident Of
Vishnoi Mohalla, Dariba, District Bhilwara.
12. Prakash Vishnoi S/o Ladu Vishnoi, R/o Near Bus Stand
Dariba, District Bhilwara.
13. Omprakash Vishnoi S/o Unknown, R/o Near Bus Stand
Dariba, District Bhilwara.
14. Satta Vishnoi S/o Heera Lal Vishnoi, R/o Gurjaar Mohalla,
Dariba, District Bhilwara.
----Respondents
(Downloaded on 02/07/2025 at 09:42:45 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:28289] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1879/2025]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Banjara
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Chandawat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
01/07/2025
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the
prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
[2025:RJ-JD:28289] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1879/2025]
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 213-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!