Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1568 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:28285]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1878/2025
1. Gayatri Rajput D/o Madho Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/
o Ward No. 10, Garhwala, Tehsil And District Bikaner
(Raj.)
2. Rajvinder Singh S/o Goura Singh, Aged About 24 Years,
R/o 8 Gm Gomawali Tehsil Vijaynagar District Sri
Ganganagar (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of
Home Affairs, Jaipur
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Sriganganagar, Through
Government Advocate, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur.
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Bikaner Through
Government Advocate, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Ram Singhpur,
District Sriganganagar Raj.
5. Station House Officer, Police Station Napasar District
Bikaner (Raj.)
6. Madho Singh S/o Sadul Singh, R/o Ward No 10 Garhwala
Tehsil And District Bikaner (Raj.)
7. Jaypal S/o Madho Singh, R/o Ward No 10 Garhwala Tehsil
And District Bikaner
8. Bhawar Singh S/o Mansigh, R/o Muslaki Tehsil
Lunkaransar District Bikaner (Raj.)
9. Kishor Singh S/o Sadul Singh, R/o Garhwala Tehsil And
District Bikaner (Raj.)
10. Mangu Singh S/o Sadul Singh, R/o Garhwala Tehsil And
District Bikaner (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Tania Chugh
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narenda Gehlot,PP with
Mr. Ravindra Singh Bhati, AGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
01/07/2025
[2025:RJ-JD:28285] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1878/2025]
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522,
the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 95-himanshu/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!