Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5652 Raj
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:5600]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1033/2025
1. Shri Dilip Kumar Ninama S/o Shri Huka Ninama, Aged
About 47 Years, Resident Of Village Sagwa, Tehsil
Sajjangarh, District Banswara (Rajasthan).
2. Shri Rangji Katara S/o Shri Hurteng, Aged About 51
Years, Resident Of Village Dugripada Post Rathdhanraj,
Tehsil Sajjangarh, District Banswara (Rajasthan).
3. Shri Ramesh Chandra Khant S/o Shri Thaneshwar, Aged
About 48 Years, Resident Of Village Rakho, Tehsil
Bagidora, District Banswara (Rajasthan).
4. Smt. Tulsi Pargi D/o Shri Maganlal Pargi, Aged About 48
Years, Resident Of Village Bhatar, Tehsil Arthuna, District
Banswara (Rajasthan).
5. Shri Jeevat Singh Garasiya S/o Shri Kure Singh, Aged
About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Gohawada, Tehsil
Kherwada District Udaipur (Raj.)
6. Shri Ram Lal Meena S/o Shri Laxman Ram Meena, Aged
About 47 Years, Resident Of Village Modiwasa, Tehsil
Kherwada District Udaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission,
Ajmer.
3. Director, Elementary Education Bikaner (Rajasthan).
4. Joint Director, Elementary Education, Udaipur Zone,
Udaipur (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Rawal.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
[2025:RJ-JD:5600] (2 of 2) [CW-1033/2025]
29/01/2025
1. Petitioner herein is before this Court seeking directions to the
respondents to give notional benefits and seniority as was given to
their counter-parts pursuant to advertisement in question.
2. At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is
covered an order dated 16.07.2014 passed by the Jaipur Bench of
this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7283/2014 : Manoj
Khandelwal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. He submits
that the petitioner is sanguine that, in case she is allowed to file a
representation qua the grievance raised in the present writ
petition and the same is considered in light of the aforesaid
judgment, she will be meted out with favorable treatment.
3. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits
of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with
a direction to the competent authority to decide the
representation (may file fresh, if not already filed) of the
petitioner, in accordance with law, keeping in view the
observations made in the case of Manoj Khandelwal (supra), as
expeditiously as possible.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA),J 27-Jitender/Sumit/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!