Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5262 Raj
Judgement Date : 23 January, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:4303]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1361/2025
Yudhistir Charan D/o Shri Shreni Dan, Aged About 38 Years,
Village And Post Rajapura Via Badi Khatu, Tehsil Sanju District
Nagaur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department
Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government
Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner (Raj.)
3. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner (Raj.)
4. Joint Director (School Education), Churu Division Churu
(Raj.)
5. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Badmer (Raj.)
6. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Nagaur (Raj.)
7. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Baytu,
District Badmer (Raj.)
8. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Jayal,
District Nagaur (Raj.)
9. Chief District Education Officer, Badmer (Raj.)
10. Chief District Education Officer, Nagaur (Raj.)
11. Chief Block Education Officer, Sardarshahar Churu (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Jhajaria, on VC.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
23/01/2025
1. Petitioner herein is seeking directions to the respondents to
regularize her service from the initial date of appointment and
[2025:RJ-JD:4303] (2 of 2) [CW-1361/2025]
accord all the consequential benefits and arrears alongwith
interest of 24% p.a.
2. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is
covered by an order dated dated 14.03.2019 passed in Ashok
Kumar Vs. State of Rajashtan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.15411/2018 and order dated 15.01.2018 passed in Dhanraj
Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.12846/2017. He submits that the petitioner is sanguine that, in
case she is allowed to file a representation qua the grievance
raised in the present writ petition and the same is considered in
light of the aforesaid judgment, she will be meted out with
favorable treatment.
3. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits
of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with
a direction to the competent authority to decide the
representation (may file fresh, if not already filed) of the
petitioner, in accordance with law, keeping in view the
observations made in the case of Ashok Kumar and Dhanraj
Meena (supra), as expeditiously as possible.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA),J 27-/Jitender//-
Whether fit for reporting : Yes / No. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!