Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4952 Raj
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:3494-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21754/2024
M/s Marudhar Food Products, Having Its Registered Premises At
F-202, Industrial Growth Centre, Khara Bikaner - 334601
Through Its Proprietor Smt. Sarita Devi Karnani D/o Shri Laxmi
Narayan Lakhotia, Aged 54 Years, Resident Of 5-C Sadul Ganj,
Opposite Moomal Hotel, Near L.i.c. Office, Bikaner, District -
Bikaner, Rajasthan, Pin - 334001
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax
Division-F, Bikaner, Office Of The Assistant Commissioner
Central Goods And Services Tax Division-F, Bikaner,
Opposite Chetanmahadev Mandir, Jaipur Road, Bikaner-
334003
2. Commissioner Of Central Gst And C. Ex./st, Jodhpur
Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Gst And C. Ex./st,
Jodhpur, G-105, New Industrial Area Basni, New
Industrial Area Near Diesel Shed, Jodhpur-342003
3. Joint Commissioner Of Central Gst And C. Ex./st, Jodhpur,
Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Gst And C. Ex./st.
Jodhpur, G-105, New Industrial Area Basni, New
Industrial Area Near Diesel Shed, Jodhpur-342003
4. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary Department Of
Revenue, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-
110001
5. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs, Through
The Chairman, North Block, New Delhi-311001
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishi Kapoor, (through VC)
Mr. Siddharth Dubey with
Mr. Shubhankar Johari
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajat Arora
HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI Order 20/01/2025
Heard.
[2025:RJ-JD:3494-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-21754/2024]
Challenge to the impugned order is mainly on the ground
that it is in violation of circulars dated 01.08.2023 and 11.10.2024
with the submission that prior to 27.07.2023, tax was not leviable.
Learned counsel for the respondents draws attention of this
Court to the reply of show cause notice and submits that the
aforesaid issue was not brought to the notice of the adjudicating
authority and it is raised for the first time before this Court.
Though learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance
upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Commissioner of Customs, Calcutta & Ors. Vs. Indian Oil Corpn.
Ltd. & Anr.(2004) 3 SCC 488, Union of India Vs. Arviva Industries
Ltd.(2014) 3 SCC 159, Fatima Bibi Ahmed Patel Vs. State of
Gujarat & Anr.(2008) 6 SCC 789 and Commissioner of Central
Excise And Service Tax, Rohtak Vs. Merino Panel Product Ltd.
(2023) 2 SCC 597, we are not inclined to exercise our discretion
to entertain this petition, particularly when the issue was not
raised by the petitioner before the adjudicating authority at the
time of adjudication.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, it is open
for the petitioner to take statutory remedy of filing appeal.
(NUPUR BHATI),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
3-divyaP/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!