Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4772 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:3115]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 9309/2024
Shashikant S/o Shankarlal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Thana,
Teh. And Dist. Dungarpur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
Gopalkrishan S/o Devkrishan, R/o Shivaji Nagar, Housing Board,
Dungarpur, Raj.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Kumar for
Mr. JVS Deora
For Respondent(s) : Mr. NS Chandawat, Dy.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order 16/01/2025
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a
challenge has been made to the order dated 11.11.2024 passed
by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dungarpur (hereinafter to
be referred as 'the appellate court') in Criminal Case No.402/2017,
whereby the application under Section 389 of Cr.P.C. filed by the
petitioner was allowed with the condition to deposit 20% of
chequeamount within 60days.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material as made available to this Court as well as the order under
assail.
3. Bereft of elaborate details, briefly stated facts of the case
are that the petitioner was tried and convicted for the offence
under Section 138 of the N.I. Act vide judgment dated 13.08.2024
passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dungarpur
(hereinafter to be referred as 'the trial court'). Aggrieved of the
judgment of conviction, he preferred an appeal before the learned
appellate court along with an application under Section 389 Cr.P.C.
[2025:RJ-JD:3115] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-9309/2024]
for suspension of sentence awarded by the learned trial court.
Vide the order under assail dated 11.11.2024, the learned
appellate court allowed the application under Section 389 of the
Cr.P.C. with the condition of depositing 20% of the fine amount
within 60days as directed by the learned trial court.
4. The grief of the petitioner would be that in view of the
mandate of law and the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Jamboo Bhandari Vs. M.P. State
Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. reported (2023) 10
SCC 446, there is no need to direct the appellant to deposit 20%
of the fine/cheque amount as well as imposition of a condition for
deposition of 20% of the cheque amount is not imperative and
mandatory.
5. In view of the limited prayer, the legal provisions and the
law enunciated in this regard by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, I
deem it appropriate to make a slight modification in the order
dated 11.11.2024.
6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is allowed
in part and the order dated 11.11.2024 passed by the learned
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dungarpur in Criminal Case
No.402/2017, is modified in the manner that now the petitioner
would deposit 10% of the cheque amount instead of 20% of the
cheque amount awarded by the learned trial court.
7. The stay petition is also disposed of.
(FARJAND ALI),J 68-chhavi/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!