Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4709 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:2874]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 662/2025
Ramdayal Ranga S/o Badri Das, Aged About 69 Years, Rango Ki Gali, Inside Nathaniyo Ki Saray, Bikaner.
----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.
3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bikaner.
4. Assistant Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Bikaner.
5. Treasurer, Bikaner, Dist. Bikaner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Bohra
For Respondent(s) : -
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
16/01/2025
1. The petitioner had filed a writ petition (SBCWP No.
6196/2020, which was disposed of by the co-ordinate Bench of
this Court in light of the judgment in the case of Dadam Das
Vaishnav vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.
8309/2012). Consequently, the petitioner was conferred due
benefits.
2. By way of present writ petition, the petitioner has raised a
grievance that the respondents are not sending his case for
[2025:RJ-JD:2874] (2 of 2) [CW-662/2025]
revision of pension in light of the judgment in the case of Dadam
Das Vaishnav (supra).
3. Mr. Bohra, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the petitioner would be satisfied if the competent authority of the
respondents is directed to expeditiously consider petitioner's
Notice for Demand of Justice dated 13.06.2024 sent on
petitioner's behalf.
4. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the
petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith photocopy of the
Notice for Demand of Justice dated 13.06.2024, copy of judgment
in the case of Dadam Das Vaishnav (supra) and certified copy of
the order instant within a period of four weeks from today.
5. In case representation is so addressed, the competent
authority shall consider the same, in accordance with law, as early
as possible, preferably within a period of three months of receipt
thereof.
6. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the
representation has been issued only with a view to ensure
expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not
be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a
particular manner.
7. The stay application also stands disposed of, accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 17-raksha/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!