Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Director, Sanskrit Education ... vs Ekta Sharma (2025:Rj-Jd:2837-Db)
2025 Latest Caselaw 4695 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4695 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Director, Sanskrit Education ... vs Ekta Sharma (2025:Rj-Jd:2837-Db) on 16 January, 2025

Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
[2025:RJ-JD:2837-DB]                   (1 of 4)                       [SAW-254/2022]


      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                   D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 254/2022

Director, Sanskrit Education Rajasthan, Office Address Block No.
6 Second Floor Dr. Radhakrishn Shiksha Sankul Jln Marg Jaipur
Rajasthan
                                                                     ----Appellant
                                       Versus
1.       Ekta Sharma D/o Subhash Chandra Sharma, Aged About
         32 Years, R/o Village Bhairusar, Post Indrapura, District
         Churu
2.       Arun Kumar Dave S/o Shri Jagdish Chandra Dave, Aged
         About 42 Years, R/o Village Anjana, Post Anjana, Tehsil
         Garhi, District Banswara (Raj.) (Dob 14.02.1978).
3.       Anil Kumar Bhambhu S/o Shri Sultana Ram Bhambhu,
         Aged About 36 Years, R/o Ward No. 08, Dabli Bas Molvi,
         Dabli Rathan, District Hanumangarh (Raj.) (Dob 13.01.
         1985).
4.       Richhpal Dhoon S/o Shri Sharwan Ram Dhoon, Aged
         About 30 Years, R/o Vp Ren, Adarsh Bal Sen. Sec. School,
         Tehsil   Merta        City,      District       Nagaur      (Raj.)   (Dob
         23.01.1991).
5.       Sunil Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Rohitash Kumar Sharma,
         Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Pawan Ahir, The Kotputli,
         District Jaipur (Raj.) (Dob 08.10.1983).
6.       Savitri Meel D/o Shri Bhagirath Singh, Aged About 35
         Years, R/o Village Ghassu Ka Bas, Post Ghassu, Tehsil
         Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.) (Dob 04.03.1986).
7.       Avinash Joshi S/o Shri Ashok Kumar Joshi, Aged About 42
         Years, R/o Vpo Dosod, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar
         (Raj.) (Dob 30.07.1979).
8.       Shivraj Saini S/o Shri Ramdhan Saini, Aged About 41
         Years, R/o Rajiv Gandhi Law College Ke Pass, Modi Ki
         Chouki    Ward       No.      02,        District    Tonk   (Raj.)   (Dob
         06.07.1980).
9.       Sunita Rathor D/o Shri Ashok Kumar, Aged About 34
         Years, R/o Kaleshwar Mandir Ke Pas Ward No. 24,
         Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (Dob 14.04.1987)


                       (Downloaded on 20/01/2025 at 09:41:38 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:2837-DB]                   (2 of 4)                          [SAW-254/2022]


10.      Jaya Vijayvargeey D/o Shri Durga Lal, Aged About 35
         Years, R/o Ahuja Colony, College Road, District Tonk
         (Raj.) (Dob 07.11. 1986).
11.      Poonam Kumari D/o Shri Suresh Chand Soni, Aged About
         40 Years, R/o E-6 Model Town, Agra Road, District Jaipur
         (Raj.) (Dob 14.09.1993).
12.      Archana Sharma D/o Girdhari Lal, Aged About 28 Years,
         R/o Village Senwal, Post Kheda, Tehsil Deeg, District
         Bharatpur (Raj.) (Dob 30.04.1993).
13.      Ajay Kumar Sahu S/o Madan Lal Sahu, Aged About 31
         Years, R/o Opposite Hospital, Station Road, Malakhera,
         Tehsil Malakhera, District Alwar (Raj.) (Dob 15.07.1990).
14.      Rakesh Sharma S/o Ayodhya Sharan Sharma, Aged About
         37 Years, R/o Ward No. 17, Bagwan Colony, Near
         Sanjeevani Hospital, Kotputli, District Jaipur (Raj.) (Dob
         19.03.1984).
15.      State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Rural
         Development            And       Panchayati           Raj      Department,
         Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.
16.      Principal Secretary, Education Department (Elementary),
         Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.
                                                                     ----Respondents


For Appellant(s)            :     Mr. B.L. Bhati, AAG a/w
                                  Mr. Deepak Chandak
For Respondent(s)           :



      HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN

Order

16/01/2025

1. Mr. B.L. Bhati, Learned Additional Advocate General

appearing for the appellant State submits that the writ petition

filed by the respondents (writ petitioners) has been decided based

on the ratio laid down in Girija Shankar vs. State of Rajasthan

[2025:RJ-JD:2837-DB] (3 of 4) [SAW-254/2022]

& Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9246/2020), decided on

25.08.2021. He has drawn this Court's attention to the impugned

order wherein the sole reason for accepting the writ petition was

the precedent established in Mohhamad Aslam vs. State of

Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11505/2019),

decided on 09.01.2020. He further submits that since there was

no independent adjudication of the present matter and the sole

basis of adjudication was the judgment in Mohhamad Aslam

(supra), which has subsequently been reversed by the Division

Bench of this Court in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.349/2020

(State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Mohhamad Aslam), decided

on 08.12.2021, nothing survives in the present appeal. The

operative paragraphs 8 and 9 of the order dated 08.12.2021 are

reproduced hereunder:

"8. In wake of the discussion made herein above, we are of the view that the appellants have issued the main select list and the reserve list strictly in accordance with the rules of selection and that the recruitment process does not suffer from any illegality whatsoever. The directions given by the learned Single Bench in the impugned orders would completely jeopardize the process of selection and it would virtually become impossible to apply the mandatory reservations against the seats in the order of merit. Needless to say that once the period of six months has passed, the recruitment authority cannot be directed to invite the candidates beyond the reserve list because the selection process has to be given a finality at some point of time. The criterion of six months has been prescribed in the Circular dated 13.01.2016 issued by the Department of Personnel, Government of Rajasthan and the same is absolutely rational and cannot be made subject matter of judicial review. The candidates, who have not been selected, would have the opportunity of applying in the upcoming recruitment processes because the remaining vacant seats would be accounted for therein.

[2025:RJ-JD:2837-DB] (4 of 4) [SAW-254/2022]

9. As an upshot of the above discussion, the impugned orders dated 09.01.2020, 11.11.2020 and 02.07.2020, cannot be sustained. Hence, the same are quashed and set aside.

The special appeals are allowed in these terms."

2. This Court, upon consideration of the aforesaid submissions,

finds that the Division Bench judgment in Mohhamad Aslam

(supra) is the governing precedent, and since there was no

independent adjudication in the present matter, no fresh

application of mind is required.

3. Accordingly, the present appeal is allowed, and the impugned

order dated 18.11.2021 (Annexure-A/1) passed in S.B. Civil Writ

Petition No.14095/2021 is hereby quashed and set aside.

(MUNNURI LAXMAN),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

16-devrajP/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter