Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4663 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:2609]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11285/2024
Digpal Singh Chouhan S/o Amrit Singh Chouhan, Aged About 32
Years, Village And Post Jhonsawa, Via Chitri, Tehsil Galiyakot,
District Dungarpur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary,
Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Additional Director General Of Police, Recruitment
And Promotion Board, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. The Superintendent Of Police, District Dungarpur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Singh
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raj Singh Bhati for
Mr. Ritu Raj Singh Bhati
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order (Oral)
15/01/2025
1. Petitioner herein is seeking directions to the respondents to
grant age relaxation of 5 years in the upper age limit under the
EWS category. Furthermore, he requests that his subsequent
selection tests be conducted, and if found to be meritorious, he
then be appointed on the post of Constable (Driver) in the TSP
Area with all consequential benefits.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner relies
on a judgment rendered by this Court in Hitesh Chandra Bhatt
& Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan 1 and states that the case of the
petitioner is squarely covered by the same.
3. A perusal of the contents of the writ petition alongwith
official records appended therewith viz a viz the ratio rendered in
1 Raj. High Court = S.B.C.W. P. No.14609/2023, decided on 13.05.2024
[2025:RJ-JD:2609] (2 of 2) [CW-11285/2024]
Hitesh Chandra Bhatt ibid, reveals that petitioner is indeed
deserving of parity with Hitesh Chandra Bhatt, whose petition was
allowed by this Court by according him age relaxation of 5 years
since he belonged to special category. It is not disputed that the
petitioner herein is from EWS category and thus is to be accorded
4 years of age relaxation in account thereof. No doubt, no post of
EWS category has been advertised, but that would, at worse,
result in the petitioner competing in the general category and in
case, he has obtained more marks than the last selected
candidate in the general category, he is entitled to the benefit of
his performance.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is also disposed of in
terms of the judgment rendered in Hitesh Chandra Bhatt ibid.
5. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the
petitioner as per his performance in the selection process and in
case he is found to be otherwise eligible and meritorious and has
obtained more marks than the last selected candidate in the
general category, he shall be given due credence of his
performance. Needful exercise be carried out within a period of 30
days upon petitioner approaching the respondents with web-print
of the instant order.
6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA),J 169-DhananjayS/Rmathur/-
Whether fit for reporting: Yes / No Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!