Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4609 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:2735]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4655/2023
1. Babu Singh S/o Aanb Singh, Aged About 47 Years, By
Caste Rajput, R/o Bijrol Khera, Tehsil Sanchore, District
Jalore (Rajasthan).
2. Sawaram S/o Ruparam, Aged About 40 Years, By Caste
Kalbi, R/o Hadetar, Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore
(Rajasthan).
3. Bhagwana Ram S/o Ramji, Aged About 52 Years, By
Caste Mali, R/o Karawadi, Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore
(Rajasthan).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Registrar, Cooperative
Societies Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The State Cooperative Returning Officer, Rajasthan State
Cooperative Election Tribunal, 10-B, Institutional Area,
Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur - 302004.
3. The District Collector, Jalore.
4. The Managing Director, Sahkari Samiti, Jalore, District
Jalore.
5. The Chief Manager, Ramdev Kray Vikray Sahkari Samiti
Ltd., Sanchore, District Jalore.
6. The Returning Officer, Ramdev Kray Vikray Sahkari Samiti
Ltd., Sanchore, District Jalore.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Teja Ram
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vineet R. Dave
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
15/01/2025 Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the
controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a
[2025:RJ-JD:2735] (2 of 2) [CW-4655/2023]
judgment rendered by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B.
Civil Writ Petiion No.5033/2023 (Jog Singh vs. State of Rajasthan
& Ors.), decided on 18.01.2024.
The operative part of the said judgment reads as under :-
"19. The issue involved in the petition cannot be challenged by way of filing the present writ petition, as an efficacious statutory alternative remedy is available to the petitioner under the Act of 2001. It is also important to note that upon the declaration of the final voter list, the election process was being set up in motion and the election has already been held on 12.04.2024, therefore, this Court should not grant indulgence while keeping into consideration the proviso under Section 58(2)(c) of the Act of 2001.
20. Thus without entering into the merits of the case the writ petition is, therefore, dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy being available to the petitioner under Act of 2001. Stay application as well as all other pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
In view of the above submissions, the present writ petition is
also dismissed in terms of the order passed by this Court in Jog
Singh(supra).
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 140-SanjayS/-C20
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!