Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 17272 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:55087]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3705/2025
1. Aditi Rathor W/o Shri Ayush Bairagi, Aged About 25
Years, D/o Shri Digpal Singh Rathor R/o Village Lohariya
Bada Post Lohariya Bada Tahsil Kushalgarh Banswada
Rajasthan
2. Ayush Bairagi S/o Shri Lokendra Bairagi, Aged About 25
Years, Ward Number 15 Kushalgarh District Banswada
Rajasthan
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Cheap Secretary
Ministry Of Home Affairs Jaipur Rajasthan
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Banswada Rajasthan
3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Kushalgarh
District Banswada Rajasthan
4. Mejor Singh Rathore S/o Shri Rajendra Singh Rathro,
Village Lohariya Bada Post Lohariya Bada Tahsil
Kushalgarh Banswada Rajasthan
5. Digpal Singh Rathore S/o Shri Rajendra Singh Rathor,
Village Lohariya Bada Post Lohariya Bada Tahsil
Kushalgarh Banswada Rajasthan
6. Keptain Singh Rathore S/o Shri Rajendra Singh Rathor,
Village Lohariya Bada Post Lohariya Bada Tahsil
Kushalgarh Banswada Rajasthan
7. Bhagyawan Singh Rathore S/o Shri Rajendra Singh
Rathor, Village Lohariya Bada Post Lohariya Bada Tahsil
Kushalgarh Banswada Rajasthan
8. Ripudaman Singh Rathore S/o Shri Digpal Singh Rathor,
Village Lohariya Bada Post Lohariya Bada Tahsil
Kushalgarh Banswada Rajasthan
9. Dipendra Singh Rathore S/o Shri Janakpal Singh Rathor,
Village Lohariya Bada Post Lohariya Bada Tahsil
Kushalgarh Banswada Rajasthan
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Love Jain
(Uploaded on 18/12/2025 at 05:46:44 PM)
(Downloaded on 18/12/2025 at 08:34:54 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:55087] (2 of 3) [CRLW-3705/2025]
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
18/12/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to have
performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was
performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel
threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are
their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned
respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with
adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so
far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed
on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of
U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the
petitioners for directing the concerned respondent authorities to
provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
(Uploaded on 18/12/2025 at 05:46:44 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:55087] (3 of 3) [CRLW-3705/2025]
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 600-divyashri/-
(Uploaded on 18/12/2025 at 05:46:44 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!