Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajesh Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:54969)
2025 Latest Caselaw 17257 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 17257 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2025

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Rajesh Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:54969) on 18 December, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:54969]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
            S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1632/2025

Rajesh Sharma S/o Shantilal Sharma, Aged About 52 Years,
Resident Of E-7, Near Tempo Stand, Bapunagar, District Bhilwara
(Raj.).
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.        State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.        Rajkumar    S/o        Nandlal    Khatik,       Resident     Of   Purani
          Dhanmandi,     Holika       Than,       P.s.    Bheemganj,        District
          Bhilwara (Raj.).
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :    Mr. Vishal Sharma.
                                  Mr. Robin
For Respondent(s)            :    Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP.
                                  Mr. Arjun Singh Rathore for R/2.


      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order 18/12/2025 S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1632/2025 :

Mr. Arjun Singh Rathore, learned counsel has appeared on

behalf of respondent No. 2. Service is, therefore, complete.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application

under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed.

The delay in filing the revision petition is hereby condoned.

Admit.

Call for the record.

S.B. Criminal Misc. Application for Suspension of Sentence (Revision) No. 375/2025 :

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application for

Suspension of Sentence (Revision).

(Uploaded on 18/12/2025 at 07:23:58 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:54969] (2 of 3) [CRLR-1632/2025]

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that accused-

petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further

submits that hearing of criminal revision petition will take

significantly long time, therefore, application of suspension of

sentence (revision) may be allowed.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed application for

suspension of sentence.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case so

also the facts and grounds raised in the instant petition and

considering the fact that hearing of the revision petition, preferred

by the petitioner against the impugned judgment, will take

sufficient time, this Court considers it just and proper to suspend

the sentence awarded to the accused-petitioner.

Accordingly, present application for suspension of sentence is

allowed and it is ordered that sentence passed by learned Special

Judicial Magistrate (NI ACT Cases) No.3, District Bhilwara in

Criminal Regular Case No.2424/2016 vide judgment dated

05.07.2023 and affirmed by learned District and Sessions Judge,

Bhilwara vide judgment dated 06.06.2024 passed in Cr. Appeal

No.149/2023 against accused-petitioner - Rajesh Sharma S/o

Shantilal Sharma, shall remain suspended, till final disposal of

the aforesaid revision and he shall be released on bail, provided

he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two

sureties of Rs.50,000/- each of to the satisfaction of the learned

trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 19.01.2026 and

whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the

conditions indicated below:-

(Uploaded on 18/12/2025 at 07:23:58 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:54969] (3 of 3) [CRLR-1632/2025]

1. That he/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the petition is decided.

2. That if the petitioner changes the place of residence, he/they will give in writing his/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

4. Petitioner shall deposit 50% of the cheque amount before the learned trial Court within a period of 30 days from the date of his release, which shall be disbursed immediately to the respondent No.2/complainant.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-petitioner in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

petitioner was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial Court. In case the said

accused-petitioner does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J 132-/Jitender//-

(Uploaded on 18/12/2025 at 07:23:58 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter