Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 17255 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:55144]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3715/2025
1. Sahiba Bano S/o Jabbar Ali, Aged About 18 Years,
Resident Of Manana, District Nagour Raj.
2. Dinesh Vaishnav S/o Bodu Das, Aged About 23 Years,
Resident Of Ramsiya, District Nagour At Present Balotra
District Balotra Raj
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home.
Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,
Jaipur.
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Ps. Balotra District Balotra.
3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Balotra, District
Balotra 3.
4. Jabbar Ali S/o Bilaludin, Resident Of Manana Tehsil
Makrana District Nagour
5. Jilfikar Ali S/o Jabbr Ali, Resident Of Manana Tehsil
Makrana District Nagour
6. Sakur Ali S/o Bilaludin, Resident Of Manana Tehsil
Makrana District Nagour
7. Jabbar Ali S/o Hanif Kha, 7. Resident Of Chandaman
Tehsil Degana District Nagour
8. Gafar Ali S/o Hanif Kha, Resident Of Chandaman Tehsil
Degana District Nagour
9. Mukhatiyar Ali S/o Kalu Kha, Resident Of Makrana District
Nagour
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tapesh Sain
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
18/12/2025
(Uploaded on 18/12/2025 at 06:28:23 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:55144] (2 of 2) [CRLW-3715/2025]
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522,
the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 14-divyashri/-
(Uploaded on 18/12/2025 at 06:28:23 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!