Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 16936 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:54026]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3637/2025
1. Payal Bheel D/o Gehari Lal Bheel, Aged About 18 Years,
R/o Adana, Tehsil Rashmi, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan
2. Shyam Lal S/o Lalu Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
Bhatto Ka Bamaniya, Tehsil Kapasan, District Chittorgarh,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of
Home Affairs, Jaipur (Raj)
2. Director General Of Police, Govt. Of Rajasthan Police Head
Quarter, Jaipur (Raj)
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Chittorgarh( Rajasthan)
4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Rashmi, District
Chittorgarh, Rajasthan
5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Kapasan, District
Chittorgarh, Rajasthan
6. Gehari Lal S/o Madhu Lal Ji, R/o Adana, Tehsil Rashmi,
District Chittorgarh.
7. Bagdiram S/o Chhogalal Ji, R/o Bodiyana, Ps Chanderiya,
District Chittorgarh.
8. Kali Bai W/o Gehari Lal, R/o Adana, Tehsil Rashmi, District
Chittorgarh
9. Tulsi Bai W/o Madhu Lal Ji, R/o Adana, Tehsil Rashmi,
District Chittorgarh.
10. Avinash S/o Bagdiram Ji, R/o Bodiyana, Ps Chanderiya,
District Chittorgarh.
11. Satyanarayan S/o Madhu Lal Ji, R/o Bodiyana, Ps
Chanderiya, District Chittorgarh.
12. Mithu Lal S/o Mangilal Ji, R/o Khakhariya Kheda, Ps
Kapasan, District Chittorgarh
13. Kamla Devi W/o Bagdiram Ji, R/o Bodiyana, Ps
Chanderiya, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
(Uploaded on 15/12/2025 at 06:07:24 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/12/2025 at 08:50:50 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:54026] (2 of 3) [CRLW-3637/2025]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Shrimali
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
15/12/2025
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522,
the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
(Uploaded on 15/12/2025 at 06:07:24 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:54026] (3 of 3) [CRLW-3637/2025]
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 531-himanshu/-
(Uploaded on 15/12/2025 at 06:07:24 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!