Heena Kumari vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:53721)
2025 Latest Caselaw 16893 Raj

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Heena Kumari vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:53721) on 11 December, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur

Bench: Kuldeep Mathur

[2025:RJ-JD:53721]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3608/2025

1.       Heena Kumari D/o Jai Singh, Aged About 22 Years, W/o
         Ob Singh, Resident Of Village Bankli, District Jalore, At
         Present Resident Of Rebariyon Ka Goliya, Odwara, District
         Jalore (Rajasthan.)
2.       Ob Singh S/o Shankar Singh, Aged About 32 Years,
         Resident Of Rebariyon Ka Goliya, Odwara, District Jalore
         (Rajasthan.)
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
         Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       The Superintendent Of Police, District Jalore (Rajasthan.)
3.       The Station House Officer, Police Station Bhadrajoon,
         District Jalore (Rajasthan.)
4.       Gomi Devi W/o Jai Singh, Resident Of Village Bankli,
         Tehsil Aahore, District Jalore Rajasthan.
5.       Jai Singh S/o Mangu Singh, Resident Of Village Bankli,
         Tehsil Aahore, District Jalore Rajasthan.
6.       Laxman Singh S/o Jai Singh, Resident Of Village Bankli,
         Tehsil Aahore, District Jalore Rajasthan.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Deependra Singh Shekhawat
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

11/12/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

(Uploaded on 11/12/2025 at 01:06:51 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:53721] (2 of 2) [CRLW-3608/2025]

The petitioners both being major persons claim to have

performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was

performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel

threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are

their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned

respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with

adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so

far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed

on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of

U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the

petitioners for directing the concerned respondent authorities to

provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 37-divya/-

(Uploaded on 11/12/2025 at 01:06:51 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)