Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 16889 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 December, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:53764]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3602/2025
1. Nirma Choudhary D/o Khuma Ram Choudhary, Aged
About 22 Years, Narnarayan Society, Parwat Potiya, Surat
City Surat (Gujrat), Presently Residing At Village Tavav,
District Jalore Rajasthan
2. Bharat K S/o Kamlesh Kumar Choudhary, Aged About 23
Years, R/o House No 17, Street Ankalapaa Mati Gali,
Cubbonpet, Bangalore North District Bangalore Karnataka
Presently Residing At Village Tavav, District Jalore
Rajasthan
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Raj., Jaipur.
2. Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur
3. Superintendent Of Police, Surat, District Surat, Gujrat.
4. Superintendent Of Police, Jalore
5. Station House Officer, Police Station Ramseen, District
Jalore (Raj)
6. Khumaram S/o Kamaram Choudhary, Aged About 50
Years, R/o Narnarayan Society, Parwat Potiya, Surat City,
Surat (Gujarat)
7. Ghati Devi W/o Khumaram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o
Narnarayan Society, Parwat Potiya, Surat City, Surat
(Gujarat)
8. Mapharam S/o Khumaram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
Narnarayan Society, Parwat Potiya, Surat City, Surat
(Gujarat)
9. Kuparam S/o Devaram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o House
No 17, Street Ankalapaa Mati Gali, Cubbonpet Bangalore
North District Bangalore Karnataka
10. Heera Ram S/o Andaram, Aged About 25 Years, Muntla
Kaba, Distict Jalore Rajasthan
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kishan Lal
(Uploaded on 11/12/2025 at 01:06:00 PM)
(Downloaded on 11/12/2025 at 04:33:58 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:53764] (2 of 3) [CRLW-3602/2025]
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
11/12/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to have
performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was
performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel
threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are
their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned
respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with
adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so
far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed
on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of
U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the
petitioners for directing the concerned respondent authorities to
provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
(Uploaded on 11/12/2025 at 01:06:00 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:53764] (3 of 3) [CRLW-3602/2025]
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 43-divya/-
(Uploaded on 11/12/2025 at 01:06:00 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!