Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 16633 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 December, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:52259]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3523/2025
1. Ankita Bishnoi D/o Santosh Kumar Bishnoi, Aged About
26 Years, Village 3 Dd, 2Km , Gharsana , Ganganagar,
Raj.
2. Kuldeep Kumar S/o Harbhansh Lal, Aged About 29 Years,
Village 3 Dd A , P.o.- 2 Km Dabbar , 2 Km , Gharsana ,
Ganganagar Raj.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur
2. The Superintendent Of Police, District Sriganganagar
3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Gharsana ,
District Sriganganagar
4. Vijaypal @ Brijlal S/o Hansraj, Chak 3 Dd, Tehsil
Gharsana , Ganganagar
5. Santosh Kumar S/o Hansraj, R/o Chak 3 Dd, Tehsil
Gharsana , Ganganagar
6. Sushil Kumar S/o Hansraj, R/o Chak 3 Dd, Tehsil
Gharsana , Ganganagar
7. Vinod Kumar S/o Hansraj, R/o Chak 3 Dd, Tehsil
Gharsana , Ganganagar
8. Vishnu Ram S/o Hansraj, R/o Chak 3 Dd, Tehsil
Gharsana , Ganganagar
9. Pawan Kumar S/o Vijaypal, R/o Chak 3 Dd, Tehsil
Gharsana , Ganganagar
10. Narendra Kumar S/o Vijaypal, R/o Chak 3 Dd, Tehsil
Gharsana , Ganganagar
11. Vikram S/o Vishnu Ram, R/o Chak 3 Dd, Tehsil Gharsana ,
Ganganagar
12. Ravi Kumar S/o Vishnu Ram, R/o Chak 3 Dd, Tehsil
Gharsana , Ganganagar
13. Vinod Kumar S/o Hansraj, R/o Chak 3 Dd, Tehsil
Gharsana , Ganganagar
14. Pawan Kumar S/o Hansraj, Chak N S M Naharavali , Tehsil
Anoopgarh
(Uploaded on 03/12/2025 at 05:59:30 PM)
(Downloaded on 03/12/2025 at 09:07:46 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:52259] (2 of 3) [CRLW-3523/2025]
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Omprakash
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
03/12/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to have
performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was
performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel
threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are
their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned
respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with
adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so
far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed
on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of
U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the
petitioners for directing the concerned respondent authorities to
provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
(Uploaded on 03/12/2025 at 05:59:30 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:52259] (3 of 3) [CRLW-3523/2025]
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 409-divya/-
(Uploaded on 03/12/2025 at 05:59:30 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!