[Cites 2, Cited by 0]
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Sabina vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:52003) on 2 December, 2025
Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:52003]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2880/2025
1. Sabina D/o Hakim Khan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o
Sindhiyo Ki Dhani, Magasar, Jaitsar, District Jodhpur, At
Present Naguro Ki Dhani, Jaimla, Dalpatpura, District.
Jaisalmer (Raj)
2. Ajarudin S/o Alladeen Kha, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
Naguro Ki Dhani, Jaimla, Dalpatpura, Dist. Jaisalmer (Raj)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of
Home Affairs, Jaipur (Raj)
2. Superintenden Of Police, Jaisalmer (Raj)
3. Superintenden Of Police, Phalodi, Rajasthan
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Satala, Dist.
Jaisalmer (Raj)
5. Station House Officer, P.s. Dechu, Dist. Phalodi (Raj)
6. Hakim Kha S/o Dhani Kha, R/o Somesar, Teh. Shergarh,
Dist Jodhpur (Raj)
7. Salim Khan S/o Dhani Kha, R/o Somesar, Teh.shergarh,
Dist. Jodhpur (Raj)
8. Alladin Khan S/o Saheb Khan, R/o Dalpatpura, Naguro Ki
Dhani, Teh. Pokaran Dist. Jaisalmer (Raj)
9. Murid Khan S/o Saheb Khan, R/o Dalpatpura, Naguro Ki
Dhani, Teh. Pokaran, Dist. Jaisalmer (Raj)
10. Hajur Khan S/o Bhikhe Kha, R/o Khejarli, Teh Bhaniyana,
District Jaisalmer (Raj)
11. Ayub Kha S/o Bhikhe Kha, R/o Khejarli, Teh. Bhaniyana,
Dist. Jaisalmer (Raj)
12. Adam Khan S/o Bhikhe Kha, R/o Khejarli, Teh. Bhaniyana,
Dist. Jaisalmer (Raj)
13. Nayalaya Khan S/o Bhikhe Kha, R/o Khejarli, Teh.
Bhaniyana, Dist. Jaisalmer (Raj)
14. Haider Khan S/o Chande Khan, R/o Sunakiyatalla, Teh.
Shergarh, Dist. Jodhpur (Raj)
15. Sikander Khan S/o Janu Khan, R/o Badla, Teh. Osian,
Dist. Jodhpur (Raj)
(Uploaded on 02/12/2025 at 02:08:17 PM)
(Downloaded on 02/12/2025 at 09:16:53 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:52003] (2 of 3) [CRLW-2880/2025]
16. Mire Khan S/o Janu Khan, R/o Badla, Teh. Osian, Dist.
Jodhpur (Raj)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
02/12/2025
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522,
the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
(Uploaded on 02/12/2025 at 02:08:17 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:52003] (3 of 3) [CRLW-2880/2025]
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
457-divya/-
(Uploaded on 02/12/2025 at 02:08:17 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
