Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 16525 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:53512]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 576/2025
1. Mohd. Shahid S/o Mohd. Sabir, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Near Nahiyon Ki Masjid, Bikaner.
2. Shabab Ali Bhati S/o Abdul Habib Bhati, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Pabu Bari, Bikaner.
3. Madhusudan Pareek S/o Omprakash Pareek, Aged About
31 Years, R/o Bikaner.
4. Mohd. Irfan S/o Harun Rashid Bhati, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Songiri Kuwa, Bikaner.
5. Bhagwan Dan Charan S/o Mohan Dan Charan, Aged
About 31 Years, R/o Ratriya Dharnok, District Bikaner.
6. Mohammad Shafiq Khokhar S/o Mohammad Rafiq
Khokhar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Choukhunti, District
Bikaner.
7. Tribhuwan Kapoor S/o Babulal Kapoor, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Kolayat, District Bikaner.
8. Rajesh Choudhary S/o Mamraj, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
Bamblu, District Bikaner.
9. Ajay Panwar S/o Mangilal Panwar, Aged About 32 Years,
R/o Ramsar, District Bikaner.
10. Sadam Hussain S/o Abdul Habib, Aged About 27 Years, R/
o Pabu Bari, Bikaner.
11. Lalit Sharma S/o Ravi Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
Rampura Basti, Bikaner.
12. Jyoti Modi W/o Pulkeet Khatri, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
Rani Bazar, Bikaner.
13. Harish Kumar S/o Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 39 Years,
R/o Tilak Nagar, Bikaner.
14. Pankaj Prajapat S/o Bhanwar Lal Prajapat, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Sudarshan Nagar, Bikaner.
15. Naveen Panwar S/o Naresh Panwar, Aged About 33 Years,
R/o M.m. Ground, Bikaner.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, The Principal Secretary, Medical And
Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Smt. Namrata Vrishni, The District Collector, Bikaner.
3. Dr. Pukhraj Sadh, Chief Medical And Health Officer,
Bikaner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mrinal Khatri for
Mr. S.K. Verma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Rathore for
Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH
Order
(Uploaded on 10/12/2025 at 05:27:26 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:53512] (2 of 2) [WCP-576/2025]
10/12/2025
1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging non-
compliance of the judgment dated 10.01.2025 passed by this
Court whereby direction was issued to the respondents to decide
the representation filed by the petitioner in a time bound manner
keeping in mind the law laid down by this Court vide judgment
dated 30.07.2024 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.12243/2024 (Shruti Moyal & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
& Ors.). The respondent have filed a reply placing on record the
order dated 04.07.2025, whereby the representation of the
petitioner has been decided while considering the judgment
referred (supra).
2. Considering the abovementioned fact, nothing survives for
adjudication in the present contempt petition and the same stands
dismissed. Notices issued are discharged.
3. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the
order dated 04.07.2025, as permissible under law.
(SANDEEP SHAH),J 54-Love/-
(Uploaded on 10/12/2025 at 05:27:26 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!