Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pukhraj Singh vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 16308 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 16308 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2025

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Pukhraj Singh vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 1 December, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:51783-DB]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14019/2025
1.       Pukhraj Singh S/o Jeevraj Singh Rajpurohit, Aged About
         64 Years, R/o Maheshnagar, Rajpurohitan Ka Vas, Barmer.
2.       Bhim Singh S/o Gopal Singh, Aged About 75 Years, R/o
         Rajputo Ka Vas, Mahesh Nagar, Dist. Barmer.
3.       Pemaram S/o Manglaram, Aged About 62 Years, R/o
         Railway Station Ke Samne, Mahesh Nagar, Barmer.
4.       Goverdhan Singh S/o Dalpat Singh, Aged About 56 Years,
         Maheshnagar, Barmer.
5.       Hari Singh S/o Shankar Singh, Aged About 74 Years, R/o
         Maheshnagar, Barmer.
6.       Mahendra Singh S/o Mangal Singh, Aged About 57 Years,
         R/o Maheshnagar, Barmer.
                                                                        ----Petitioners
                                       Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
         Of Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,
         Jaipur.
2.       The Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Jaipur.
3.       District Collector, Balotra.
4.       Sub-Divisional          Magistrate,        Sindhri         Division,   District
         Barmer.
5.       Village Development              Officer,      Tehsil       Sindhri,   District
         Balotra.
6.       Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Balotra.
7.       Tehsildar, Sindhri, District Balotra.
8.       Patwari Sindhri, District Balotra.
                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Vivek Firoda
                                   Mr. Sharwan Kumar Godara
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. I.R Choudhary AAG with
                                   Mr. Pawan Bharti


HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU

Order

01/12/2025

1. Considering that the issue raised in this writ petition is

similar to the issue which stands finally adjudicated by this Court

at Jaipur Bench in a bunch of 440 cases with the lead case of

(Uploaded on 02/12/2025 at 02:59:42 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:51783-DB] (2 of 3) [CW-14019/2025]

Sheela Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. in D.B. Civil

Writ Petition No.7718/2025 decided on 14.11.2025.

2. We need not again dwell with the issue afresh. In the

aforesaid cases, this Court has passed final directions which held

as under:-

"224.1 In view of the adjudication made and conclusion drawn in Part-A of the judgment, the writ petitions challenging the final notifications issued under Section 3 of the Act of 2009 as well as Section 101 of the Act of 1994, are dismissed.

224.2 In view of the adjudication made and conclusion drawn in Part-B of the judgment, D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.831/2025 (State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Dhanna Ram and Ors.) and other special appeals challenging the interim order dated 23.05.2025 to the extent of Para 7 & 8 of the same, are allowed.

All the writ petitions challenging the process of delimitation initiated in pursuance of the notices issued under Section 101 of the Act of 1994, are dismissed.

It is directed that the concerned District Collectors shall send the proposal for delimitation to the state Government and the three members high-level committee constituted for the purpose of examining the same, shall take final decision upon the proposals for delimitation so sent by the concerned District Collectors in an objective manner. The State Government shall complete the entire exercise of delimitation on or before 31.12.2025.

224.3 In view of the adjudication made and conclusion drawn in Part-C of the judgment, the writ petitions challenging the process of delimitation/change of boundaries of the municipal wards in absence of change of census or change in the number of wards or change in the territorial boundaries of the municipality, are allowed. The respondents are directed not to effect any change in the internal boundaries of the municipal wards in such cases. Consequently, D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.1005/2025 (State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs Narayan Singh Solanki & Ors.) filed for challenging the interim order dated 11.06.2025, is hereby dismissed.

224.4 In view of the adjudication made and conclusion drawn in Part-D of the judgment, the writ petitions challenging removal of Panchayat Samiti

(Uploaded on 02/12/2025 at 02:59:42 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:51783-DB] (3 of 3) [CW-14019/2025]

Member / Pradhan, on account of delimitation of respective areas / wards, are hereby dismissed.

224.5 In view of the adjudication made and conclusion drawn in Part-E of the judgment, the writ petitions relating to appointment of the administrator, are dismissed.

224.6 In view of the adjudication made and conclusion drawn in Part-F of the judgment, the writ petitions praying for fixing/nominating the village headquarter are dismissed.

224.7 In view of the adjudication made and conclusion drawn in Part-G of the judgment, D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.4686/2025 [Sanyam Lodha Vs. State of Rajasthan] as well as D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1285/2025 (Giriraj Singh Devanda vs. State of Rajasthan & ors.) praying for a direction for holding the elections of Municipality or Panchayati Raj Institutions, respectively, are disposed of with a direction to the State Government that after completing the delimitation exercise, elections of all the Local Self Bodies i.e. Panchayats as well as Municipality, shall immediately be conducted simultaneously and the entire exercise for such elections shall be completed on or before 15.04.2026.

224.8 To promote the spirit of 'Save Paper - Save Environment', the Registry of this Court is directed that, while placing a copy of this judgment in concerned files as well as while processing applications for issuance of certified copies of this judgment pertaining to any specific writ petition or special appeal, it shall issue a certified copy comprising the first page of the judgment, the relevant page showing the cause title of the respective writ petition/special appeal, and the full text of the judgment beginning from Page No.288 of this judgment."

3. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. The

observations/directions made in the case of Sheela Kumari (supra)

shall apply mutatis mutandis to the present case too.

4. All pending applications stand disposed of.

(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACJ

1-divyaP/-

(Uploaded on 02/12/2025 at 02:59:42 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter