Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6255 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 August, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:36172-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 573/2025
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary,
Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj,
Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, (Rajasthan).
2. The Additional Commissioner, Rural Development And
Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Nagaur.
----Appellants
Versus
1. Badri Prasad Lakhara S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Lakhara,
Aged About 36 Years, R/o 261, Lakharo Ka Bas, Khinwsar,
Tehsil Khinwsar, District Nagaur (Raj.).
2. Shahbaz Khan S/o Abdul Rauf Khan, Aged About 41
Years, R/o Near Old Post Office, Ward No. 5, Parbatsar,
Tehsil Parbatsar, District Nagaur (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Indra Raj Choudhary, AAG with
Mr. Kuldeep Singh Solanki
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Khet Singh Rajpurohit
Mr. Veeram Singh
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Order
13/08/2025
1. Learned Additional Advocate General fairly submits that the
impugned order dated 29.11.2022 was passed in two writ
petitions namely S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17276/2022 (Badri
Prasad Lakhara & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) and S.B.
Civil Writ Petition No.17316/2022 (Chander Shekhar Vs. The State
of Rajasthan & Ors.). He submits that the impugned order has
already been upheld by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide
[2025:RJ-JD:36172-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-573/2025]
judgment dated 03.07.2025 passed in D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ
No.538/2025 (The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Chander
Shekhar). In light of the same judgment having been adjudicated,
learned AAG further submits that there could be some
distinguishing point in the present case.
2. This Court is of the firm opinion that once a common
judgment is passed in two cases and another Division Bench has
adjudicated upon the challenge to the said common judgment in
one matter and dismissed the appeal preferred by the State, then
it would be in the interest of judicial discipline and judicial
propriety of this Court not to make any consideration on the said
common judgment, on merits in another case. Hence, on the
same grounds as already rendered by the Coordinate Bench in
Chander Shekhar (supra), the present appeal is also dismissed.
3. Since the delay is similar, the point regarding delay is also
dismissed on the same terms as in the Chander Shekhar (supra).
(BIPIN GUPTA),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 13-nirmala/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!