Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gaja Nand vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:36192)
2025 Latest Caselaw 6250 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6250 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 August, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Gaja Nand vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:36192) on 13 August, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:36192]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                              No. 1030/2024

Gaja Nand S/o Shri Jagana Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward
No. 39, Churu (Rajasthan) (Presently Lodged In Central Jail,
Bikaner)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Shambhoo Singh
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
                                Mr. S.K. Verma



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH

Order

13/08/2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicant as well as

learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on

record.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant submits that

appellant-applicant was on bail during the course of the trial and

the allegation against him is a single stab wound that too was on

the spur of the moment and there was no enmity between the

injured and the appellant-applicant. He further submits that the

injury is not on any vital part of the body of injured. He also

submits that the appellant-applicant had already remained behind

the bars for a period of one year. In these circumstances, he prays

that the sentence awarded to the appellant-applicant may be

suspended and he may be released on bail.

[2025:RJ-JD:36192] (2 of 3) [SOSA-1030/2024]

3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as S.K. Verma appearing

for the complainant opposes the application for suspension of

sentence and submits that the doctor has opined that the injury

No.1 is endangerous to the life and therefore, the appellant-

applicant is not entitled to be enlarged on bail.

4. Upon consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of

both the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances

of the case, including the fact that the injury is of a single stab

wound and also considering the fact that the incident took place

on the spur of moment and there is no previous enmity between

accused and complainant as well as the fact that the accused was

behind the bars for a period of almost one year and that the

chances of hearing of appeal in near future is bleak, this Court is

of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence

awarded to the accused appellants-applicants.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 of Cr.P.C./ 430 of BNSS is allowed and it is

ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Additional

Sessions Judge, Churu, vide judgment dated 13.08.2024 in

Sessions Case No.17/2014, (CIS No.95/2014) against the

appellant-applicant Gaja Nand S/o Shri Jagana Ram, shall

remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he

shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in

the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to

the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

court on 10.09.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

[2025:RJ-JD:36192] (3 of 3) [SOSA-1030/2024]

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

Court for cancellation of bail.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J 133-Love/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter