Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4391 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:34951]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2210/2024
1. Prem Devi W/o Babu Lal, Aged About 64 Years, R/o
Kapurdi, Raipur, Pali.
2. Rakhi W/o Ramesh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Kapurdi,
Raipur, Dist. Pali.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Prem Devi W/o Chena Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o
Kapurdi, Raipur, Dist. Beawar.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2214/2024
1. Chena Ram S/o Babu Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o
Kapurdi, Tehsil Raipur, Dist. Pali, Rajasthan
2. Rakesh S/o Khiya Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o
Kapurdi, Tehsil Raipur, Dist. Pali, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Prem Devi W/o Chena Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o
Kapurdi, Raipur, Dist. Beawar.
----Respondents
Connected with
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No.6449/2025
Ramesh S/o Babu Lal aged about 40 years, Resident of Kapurdi,
Tehsil Raipur, District Beawar (Pali), Rajasthan
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan.
2. Prem Devi W/o Chena Ram aged about 36 years, Resident of
(Downloaded on 11/08/2025 at 09:39:41 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:34951] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-2210/2024]
Kapurdi, Raipur, District Beawar.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Singh Udawat
For Respondent(s) : Mr. H.S. Jodha, PP
Mr. Raveindra Acharya and
Mr. Ramdev Rajpurohit for
complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
06/08/2025
It is contended by the learned counsel for the parties that
during the pendency of the criminal proceedings, the parties have
entered into a compromise before the Mediation Center of this
Hon'ble High Court.
As per the Mediation Report, the petitioners and the
complainants have amicably settled their dispute with certain
conditions.
Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a
decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in case of Madhukar
& Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. (Criminal Appeal
No.7212/2025), wherein it was held that after the compromise, if
allegation levelled against the petitioner was for the offence under
Section 376 of the IPC, then there is no bar on the Court from
quashing the proceedings, the relevant part of this judgments
reads as follows:-
"Therefore, having considered the particular facts and circumstances of this case, and taking into account, the categorical stand taken by the complainant and the nature of the settlement, we are of the opinion
[2025:RJ-JD:34951] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-2210/2024]
that the continuation of the criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose and would only amount to abuse of process."
In view of the above, the criminal misc. petition filed by the
petitioner are succeeded, thus, allowed and the FIR No.68/2024
registered at Police Station Raipur, District Beawar (Pali) is
quashed and set aside.
The mediation report be taken on record.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J 73-74 & today permission--Hanuman/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!