Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 12577 Raj
Judgement Date : 29 August, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:38754]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 211/2025
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Appellant
Versus
Bheparam S/o Golaram Vishnoi, R/o Tilwasani Tehsil Bilara Dist
Jodhpur (Raj.)
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sameer Pareek, PP
Mr. Prem Panwar, PP
For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
29/08/2025
1. There is a delay of 75 days in filing of the appeal, for which
an application has been moved for condonation of the delay.
Detailed reasons have been mentioned in the application
under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, contending therein the
circumstances constrained of which, despite due diligence,
delay has occasioned.
2. Considering the grounds mentioned in the application, the
same is allowed. The delay is condoned.
3. The State Officers have wrongly preferred the leave to
appeal instead of an appeal under Section 377 of the Cr.P.C.
for enhancement of the sentence. A leave petition seeking
permission to move an appeal can be moved for making a
challenge to the judgment of acquittal.
[2025:RJ-JD:38754] (2 of 2) [CRLLA-211/2025]
4. Learned Government Advocate and the Public Prosecutor are
sensitized to take note of the above legal aspect in future.
5. Looking to the totality of the facts and circumstances and in
the interest of justice, the leave petition is disposed of. The
same be registered as an appeal under Section 377 Cr.P.C.
(FARJAND ALI),J 1-Samvedana/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!