Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Of Rajasthan vs Huka (2025:Rj-Jd:38067)
2025 Latest Caselaw 10788 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10788 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

The State Of Rajasthan vs Huka (2025:Rj-Jd:38067) on 26 August, 2025

Author: Dinesh Mehta
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

[2025:RJ-JD:38067]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Writ Misc Application No. 201/2025

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Engineer, Mahi Bajaj Sagar Project, Banswara At Present The Superintending Engineer, Construction Zone, Mahi Bajaj Sagar Project, Banswara Rajasthan.

2. The Executive Engineer, Coman Civil Works Division-I, At Present The Executive Engineer, Mahi Dam Division I, Mahi Project, Banswara Rajasthan.

3. Judge, Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Udaipur (Raj.).

----Petitioners Versus

1. Huka Father/o Rakma, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Samapada Post Kesharpura, Tehsil And District Banswara Rajasthan.

2. Prabhu S/o Shri Bhanji Mahida, R/o Singhpura Post Kadaliya Tehsil And District Banswara Rajasthan

3. Prabhu Lal S/o Shri Galji, R/o Aankeleshwar Post Banswara (Ward No. 27) Tehsil And District Banswara Rajasthan.

4. Gautam S/o Shri Hema, (4/1) Smt. Roopa W/o Lt. Shri Gautam S/o Shri Hema, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Samaipura Post Kadaliya, Tehsil And District Banswara Rajasthan.

5. Smt. Puni D/o Shri Rakma W/o Shri Prabhu, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Samapada, Post Kesharpura, Tehsil And District Banswara Rajasthan.

6. Devi Lal S/o Shri Heerji, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Sundanpur, Post Sundanpur, Tehsil And District Banswara Rajasthan.

7. Smt. Lali D/o Shri Nagji W/o Shri Hakru Damore, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Kalanala Post Nalda Tehsil And District Banswara Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Milap Chopra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ravindra Singh

[2025:RJ-JD:38067] (2 of 2) [WMAP-201/2025]

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

26/08/2025

1. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering

the submissions made at bar, this Court is of the view that the

issue in question is not covered by the judgment of this Court in

the case of Smt. Dhuli vs. The Judge, Labour Court & Ors. (S.B.

Civil Writ Petition No. 1087/2006) decided 16.04.2007, inasmuch

as, after expiry of substantial period, the Court may or may not

like to pass an order of reinstatement, while setting aside the

order regarding back-wages, the facts of each case have to be

taken into consideration in light of the contentions of the rival

parties.

2. Accordingly, the present application is allowed. The order

dated 03.12.2024 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.

14357/2015 is recalled.

3. The writ petition is restored to its original number.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 58-Mak/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter