Manpreet Kaur vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:18923)
2025 Latest Caselaw 11928 Raj

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Manpreet Kaur vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:18923) on 17 April, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur

Bench: Kuldeep Mathur

[2025:RJ-JD:18923]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1036/2025

1.       Manpreet Kaur D/o Bhola Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/
         o 85 Rb, Tehsil Raisinghnagar District Sri Ganganagar
         Rajasthan.
2.       Malkit Singh S/o Amar Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o 3
         Ndr-A, Nirwana, Tehsil Suratgarh District Sri Ganganagar,
         Rajasthan.
                                                                    ----Petitioners
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Department Of Home, Government Of
         Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj)
2.       Inspector General Of Police, Bikaner Range, Bikaner.
3.       The Superintendent Of Police, Sri Ganganagar.
4.       The Station House Officer, Police Station Raisinghnagar,
         District Sri Ganganagar.
5.       Bhola Singh S/o Mana Singh, R/o 85 Rb, Police Station
         Raisinghnagar District Sri Ganganagar Rajasthan.
6.       Rukvinder Singh S/o Gurmukh Singh, R/o 85 Rb, Police
         Station Raisinghnagar District Sri Ganganagar Rajasthan.
7.       Sukhvinder Singh S/o Amreek Singh, R/o 85 Rb, Police
         Station Raisinghnagar District Sri Ganganagar Rajasthan.
8.       Harjinder Singh S/o Amreek Singh, R/o 85 Rb, Police
         Station Raisinghnagar District Sri Ganganagar Rajasthan.
9.       Seema Rani W/o Anil Singh, R/o 12 Wali Police Station
         Raisinghnagar, District Sri Ganganagar Rajasthan.
10.      Anil Singh S/o Unknown, R/o 12 Wali Police Station
         Raisinghnagar, District Sri Ganganagar Rajasthan.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Manish Kr. Pareek
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

17/04/2025

[2025:RJ-JD:18923] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1036/2025]

The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live

in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other

against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at

the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The

petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent

authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection

but no heed has been paid to their request so far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in

relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the

judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the

prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned

respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners

deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 252-himanshu/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)