Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kailash vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 11885 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11885 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Kailash vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 17 April, 2025

Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
[2025:RJ-JD:18803-DB]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
 D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                                  No. 289/2025

Kailash S/o Mohanram, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Ladadiya, Teh.
Didwana P.s. Molasar Dist. Nagaur. (Lodged In Central Jail,
Ajmer)
                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.       Meena Devi W/o Late, R/o Ladadiya, Teh. Didwana P.s.
         Molasar Dist. Nagaur. (Lodged In Central Jail, Ajmer)
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH

Order

17/04/2025

1. The appellant-applicant herein has been convicted and

sentenced as below vide judgment dated 15.06.2011 passed by

the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Deedwana, District Nagaur

in Sessions Case No.19/2009:

Offences Prison In default of payment of fine U/s Punishment further undergo 376(2) of IPC Imprisonment for Extra 1 years of S.I. Life with the fine of Rs.5,000/-/-

363 of IPC Rigorous Extra 6 Months of S.I. Imprisonment for 7 years with the fine of Rs.1,000/-

[2025:RJ-JD:18803-DB] (2 of 3) [SOSA-289/2025]

2. The appellant-applicant has preferred the application for

suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. for suspension

of sentences during the pendency of the appeal and for release on

bail.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant submits that he

has appointed from Legal Aid as the appellant has been identified

by the Legal Service Authority as the case having prolonged

custody lying into the heinous nature of crime, whereby, the

appellant committed rape upon a minor and has been convicted

under Section 376(2) of IPC. He does not wish to make any

averment on merits but merely states that the appellant has

completed actual custody of 15 years 8 months and 4 days and

total sentence of 17 years 8 months and 6 days.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application for

suspension of sentence.

5. This Court, on a conjoint consideration of the facts of the

case as well as the prolonged custody, is inclined to suspend the

suspension of sentence application.

6. Accordingly, the instant application for suspension of

sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that substantive sentence passed by learned Additional

Sessions Judge, Deedwana, District Nagaur in Sessions Case

No.19/2009, against the appellant-applicant, namely, Kailash S/o

Mohanram shall remain suspended till final disposal of the

aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he

executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial

Judge for his appearance in this court on 17.05.2025 and

[2025:RJ-JD:18803-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-289/2025]

whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the

conditions indicated below:

1. That he will appear before the trial court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant change the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s) they will give in writing their changed address to the trial court.

7. The learned trial court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case relating to original case in which the accused-

applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not been taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of the cases in the trial court. In case the

said accused-applicant does not appear before the trial court,

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 21-mohit/love-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter