Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahender Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:18933)
2025 Latest Caselaw 11497 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11497 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Mahender Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:18933) on 16 April, 2025

Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2025:RJ-JD:18933]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                                  No. 204/2024

                                           In

                     S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 241/2025

Mahender Singh S/o Shri Hanuman Singh, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o Village Dhingtaniya, P.s. Sadulsahar, Dist. Sri Ganganagar,
Raj. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bikaner).
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                    ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. S.R. Godara
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Sri Ram Choudhary, AGA



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

16/04/2025

1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been

moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment dated

14.12.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases

Sangaria, District Hanumangarh in Sessions Case No.7/2017

whereby he was maximum convicted and sentenced to suffer ten

years' RI along with a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- under Section 8/21 &

8/25 of the NDPS Act and lesser sentence under Section 18 (C)

/27 (B), (ii) of NDPS Act.

2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that

the learned trial Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal and

factual aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous

conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required to be

[2025:RJ-JD:18933] (2 of 3) [SOSA-204/2024]

appreciated again by this court being the first appellate Court. The

appellant remained on custody from 19.03.2017 to 16.07.2018

and from 14.12.2023 he is in custody. He was on bail during trial

and did not misuse the liberty so granted to him; hearing of the

appeal is likely to take long time, therefore, the application for

suspension of sentence may be granted.

3. Per contra, learned public prosecutor has vehemently

opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the accused-

applicant for releasing the appellant on application for suspension

of sentence.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material available on record.

5. Considering the submission with regard to non-compliance of

mandatory provisions and flouting of standing order issued by the

Government of India and further considering that hearing of the

appeal would likely to take a long time and the fact that during the

trial, the appellant remained on bail and did not misuse the liberty

so granted to him, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case

for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant.

6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentence passed by learned trial court, the details of which are

provided in the first para of this order, against the appellant-

applicant named above shall remain suspended till final disposal of

the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail provided he

executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

Judge for his appearance in this court on 19.05.2025 and

[2025:RJ-JD:18933] (3 of 3) [SOSA-204/2024]

whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the

conditions indicated below:-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

7. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused applicant does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(FARJAND ALI),J 79-Mamta/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter