Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mularam vs State Of Rajasthan
2025 Latest Caselaw 11496 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11496 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Mularam vs State Of Rajasthan on 16 April, 2025

Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) Application
                          No.668/2025
                                          in
              S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 723/2025

Moolaram S/o Lichhiram, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Hemsagar,
Karjoi, Police Station Falsund, District Jaisalmer (Raj) (At Present
Lodged In The Central Jail, Jaisalmer)
                                                                          ----Appellant
                                      Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                     ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)            :     Mr. Bharat Gurjar
For Respondent(s)           :     Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, DyGA



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

16/04/2025

1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been

moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment dated

08.04.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases,

Pokaran, District Jaisalmer in Sessions Case No.41/2018

(81/2017) whereby he was convicted and sentenced to suffer 4

years' RI alongwith a fine of Rs.20,000/- under Section 8/15 of

NDPS Act.

2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that

the learned trial Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal and

factual aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous

conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required to be

appreciated again by this court being the first appellate Court. The

appellant was on bail during trial and did not misuse the liberty so

(2 of 3)

granted to him; hearing of the appeal is likely to take long time,

therefore, the application for suspension of sentence may be

granted.

3. Per contra, learned public prosecutor has vehemently

opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the accused-

applicant for releasing the appellant on application for suspension

of sentence.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material available on record.

5. Considering the submission with regard to total non-

compliance of mandatory provisions of NDPS Act and further the

fact that embargo contained under Section 32A and 37 of NDPS

Act is not attracted in this case as well as considering that hearing

of the appeal would likely to take a long time and further

considering the submission that during the entire course of trial,

he remained on bail and did not misuse the liberty so granted to

him, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending

the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant.

6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentence passed by learned trial court, the details of which are

provided in the first para of this order, against the appellant-

applicant named above shall remain suspended till final disposal of

the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail provided he

executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

Judge for his appearance in this court on 15.05.2025 and

(3 of 3)

whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the

conditions indicated below:-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

7. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused applicant does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(FARJAND ALI),J 129-Pramod/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter