Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Deepika Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:18297)
2025 Latest Caselaw 11367 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11367 Raj
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Deepika Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:18297) on 9 April, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:18297]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 962/2025

1.       Deepika Sharma D/o Ram Swaroop, Aged About 24 Years,
         W/o Shrawan, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of 4 Pgm,
         70 Gb, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, At Present Residing At
         5 Pgm, Post 70 Gb, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
2.       Shrawan S/o Phouji, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of 5
         Pgm, Post 70 Gb, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
                                                                 ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of
         Home Affairs, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2.       The Superintendent Of Police, Shri Ganganagar Rajasthan
3.       The Station House Officer, Police Station Anupgarh District
         Sri Ganganagar
4.       Ramswaroop S/o Lichi Ram, Resident Of 4 Pgm, Police
         Station Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
5.       Yogesh S/o Ram Swaroop, Resident Of 4 Pgm, Police
         Station Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
6.       Krishna Devi W/o Ram Swaroop, Resident Of 4 Pgm,
         Police Station Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
7.       Lichi Ram S/o Kumbha Ram, Resident Of 4 Pgm, Police
         Station Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
8.       Radha Kishan S/o Lichi Ram, Resident Of Near Ramdev Ji
         Mandir, Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
9.       Amit S/o Radha Kishan, Resident Of Near Ramdev Ji
         Mandir, Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
10.      Himanshu S/o Radha Kishan, Resident Of Near Ramdev Ji
         Mandir, Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
11.      Vikash S/o Jagdish Sharma, Resident Of Bhagibandar,
         Police Station Goluwala, District Sri Ganganagar.
12.      Anil Kumar S/o Bhanwar Lal, Resident Of Hirnawali, Police
         Station Chunawad, District Sri Ganganagar.
13.      Ganga Ram S/o Madan Laal, Resident Of Rampura,
         District Hanumangarh.
14.      Rajesh S/o Madan Lal, Resident Of Rampura, District
         Hanumangarh.


                     (Downloaded on 09/04/2025 at 09:52:25 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:18297]                   (2 of 3)                       [CRLW-962/2025]


 15.     Foji Ram S/o Chandu Ram, Resident Of 5 Pgm, Police
         Station Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
 16.     Mahaveer S/o Foji Ram, Resident Of 5 Pgm, Police Station
         Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Puna Ram
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Narendra Singh Chundawat, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

09/04/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to have

performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was

performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel

threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are

their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned

respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with

adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so

far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed

on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners

[2025:RJ-JD:18297] (3 of 3) [CRLW-962/2025]

for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide

protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 222-himanshu/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter