Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs Smt. Pappu Devi (2024:Rj-Jd:40048)
2024 Latest Caselaw 8590 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8590 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs Smt. Pappu Devi (2024:Rj-Jd:40048) on 26 September, 2024

Author: Nupur Bhati

Bench: Nupur Bhati

[2024:RJ-JD:40048]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                     S.B. Misc. Application No. 70/2024

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Through Its Authorized Office,
T.p. Claims Hub, Divisional Office - 1, Abhay Chambers, Jalori
Gate, Jodhpur.
                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.       Smt. Pappu Devi W/o Late Joga Ram, R/o Devariya
         (Deriya), Tehsil Pachpadra, Dist. Barmer.
2.       Ramesh S/o Late Joga Ram, (Minor) Minor Represented
         Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Pappu Devi. R/o
         Devariya (Deriya), Tehsil Pachpadra, Dist. Barmer.
3.       Mst.    Mamta        D/o      Late      Joga      Ram,     (Minor)    Minor
         Represented Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt.
         Pappu Devi. R/o Devariya (Deriya), Tehsil Pachpadra,
         Dist. Barmer.
4.       Mst. Netu D/o Late Joga Ram, (Minor) Minor Represented
         Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Pappu Devi. R/o
         Devariya (Deriya), Tehsil Pachpadra, Dist. Barmer.
5.       Sona Ram S/o Shri Kana Ram, R/o Devariya (Deriya),
         Tehsil Pachpadra, Dist. Barmer.
6.       Smt. Madhu Devi W/o Shri Sona Ram, R/o Devariya
         (Deriya), Tehsil Pachpadra, Dist. Barmer.
7.       Bhanwar Lal S/o Shri Chaina Ram Vishnoi, R/o Village
         Joliyali Hemnagar, Dist. Jodhpur (Owner)
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Jagdish Vyas.



                HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order

26/09/2024

1. The instant misc. application has been filed by learned

counsel for the applicant/appellant-Insurance Company seeking

clarification/modification in the judgment/award dated 12.08.2024

[2024:RJ-JD:40048] (2 of 3) [CMAP-70/2024]

passed in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1142/2016 [The New India

Assurance Company Ltd. v. Smt. Pappu Devi & Ors.] passed by

this Court whereby the misc. appeal filed by the claimants was

partly allowed and they were also held entitled to get enhanced

compensation.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the

applicant/appellant-Insurance Company that para No.17 has

inadvertently been framed as under:-

"17.In this view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the impugned order dated 23.12.2015 passed by the learned Commissioner, Employer's Compensation, Balotra (Barmer) in Claim Case No. E.C.C.F 52/2011 is modified to the extent of the joint and several liability imposed upon the appellant/insurance company to pay compensation to the claimants/respondent no. 1 to 6. The claimants would be at liberty to recover the amount of penalty from the owner-respondent No.7 of the offending vehicle."

3. Learned counsel for the applicant - Insurance Company also

orally submits that inadvertently, the rate of interest has also not

been mentioned in para No.18 of the judgment dated 12.08.2024.

Learned counsel for the applicant Insurance Company thus, urges

that rectification of the aforesaid error is essential.

4. In view of the submissions made, this Court finds that

inasmuch as the appeal preferred by the appellant Insurance

Company has been allowed by this Court vide judgment/award

dated 12.08.2024, thus, in Para 17 it ought to have been

mentioned that the appellant Insurance company is exonerated

[2024:RJ-JD:40048] (3 of 3) [CMAP-70/2024]

from its liability to pay compensation to respondent/claimants.

Thus, the application filed by the applicant/appellant - Insurance

Company is allowed in the interest of justice. Paras No.17 & 18 of

the judgment/award dated 12.08.2024 shall be read as under:-

"17. In this view of the matter, this Court is of the view that by the impugned order dated 23.12.2015, the Commissioner, Employees' Compensation Balotra has erred in fastening the liability to pay the compensation upon the appellant Insurance Company. The order impugned is accordingly modified and the appellant Insurance company is exonerated from its liability to pay the compensation and the claimants would be at liberty to recover the amount of compensation, as determined by the Commissioner, from the respondent No.7/owner. Any amount, if already deposited by the appellant-Insurance Company, shall be adjusted accordingly.

18. In compliance of the interim order dated 20.05.2016, 50% of the compensation amount along with interest @ 6% deposited by the appellant - Insurance Company shall be recovered from the owner of the vehicle."

5. This order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order

dated 12.08.2024.

(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J 487-pradeep/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter