Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8323 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:39264]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Application No. 65/2024
1. Ishwar Singh S/o Chiman Singh, Aged About 71 Years, R/
o Sindarath Tehsil Sirohi District Sirohi
2. Smt Hariya Kanwar W/o Ishwar Singh, Aged About 68
Years, R/o Sindarath Tehsil Sirohi District Sirohi
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Kanti Lal S/o Uaka Ji, R/o Mul Gogipada Tehsil Aspur
District Dungarpur At Present Resident Of Ahmedabad
Rakhiyal Amratlal Ki Chali Ahmedabad Gujarat
2. Sanjay Bhai S/o Nanda Bhai Jiwani, Resident Of
Bharapada Gariya Thar District Bhawnagar Gujarat
3. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd, Through Divisional
Manager Residency Road Jodhpur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Singh Rathore for
claimants/appellants.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Dadhich, associate to Mr.
N.K. Mehta for respondent No.3.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
Order
21/09/2024
1. The instant misc. application has been filed by learned
counsel for the applicant/respondent No.3-Insurance Company
seeking clarification/modification in the judgment/award dated
24.07.2024 passed in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.871/2010 [Ishwar
Singh & Ors. v. Kanti Lal & Ors.] passed by this Court whereby the
misc. appeal filed by the claimants was partly allowed and they
were also held entitled to get enhanced compensation.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent No.3-
Insurance Company in the application that in the operative portion
[2024:RJ-JD:39264] (2 of 3) [CMAP-65/2024]
i.e. para No.17 of the above-said judgment/award dated
24.07.2024, due to an inadvertent error, direction for pay and
recover the amount of compensation has not been mentioned
whereas, the learned Tribunal vide its order dated 07.12.2007,
had exonerated the insurance company from paying the quantum
of compensation in favour of the claimants/appellants. Learned
counsel for respondent-Insurance Company, thus, seeks
clarification in the order dated 24.07.2024 up to the extent that
liability to pay the amount of compensation is on the respondent
No.2-owner and not on respondent No.3-Insurance Company,
which would then be recovered from the respondent No.2-owner
of the offending vehicle.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant, on the other hand, orally
submits that inadvertently, his presence on behalf of the
claimants/appellants has not been marked in the order dated
24.07.2024.
4. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the instant
misc. application is allowed. In the order dated 24.07.2024, it is
hereby directed up to the extent that the respondent No.3-
Insurance Company, as an interim measure, shall pay the
enhanced amount of compensation i.e. Rs.2,53,600/- in favour of
the claimants/appellants within a period of two months from today
and the said amount shall be recovered from respondent No.2-
owner of the offending vehicle, with the interest @ 6% per
annum. Other conditions of the order dated 24.07.2024 shall
remain the same. Also, attendance of learned counsel Mr. Bharat
Singh Rathore shall be marked on behalf of the
appellants/claimants.
[2024:RJ-JD:39264] (3 of 3) [CMAP-65/2024]
5. This order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order
dated 24.07.2024.
(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J
93-/Devesh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!