Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8140 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 September, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:38404]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15251/2024
Rafiq Mohammad S/o Naseer Mohammad, Aged About 58 Years,
108, Santosh Colony, Vivekanand Nagar, Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director General, Civil Defence And Commandant
General, Home Guards, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. District Commandant, Home Guards, Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Divya Bapna
Ms. Nikita Mathur
For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
18/09/2024
1. This writ petition has been preferred with the following
prayers:
"1. Issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction to the respondents, directing them to consider and grant an extension of the petitioner's service in the Home Guard, beyond the prescribed retirement date of 31.08.2024 until the age of 60.
2. Quash and set aside the discharge order dated 03.09.2024 (Annx.5) and any other related orders, to the extent they mandate retirement solely based on age.
3. Pass any other orders or directions as deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.
[2024:RJ-JD:38404] (2 of 2) [CW-15251/2024]
2. It is relevant to mention that in judgment dated 27.03.2017
passed in SBCWP No.1508/2015 & other writ petitions, this
Hon'ble High Court directed as under :-
"Accordingly, the above mentioned writ petitions are disposed of as under :-
A. No mandamus can be issued to the State to extend the services of the Home Guards Volunteers from 55 to 60 years.
B. The appropriate authority shall formulate fresh policy / scheme in furtherance of proviso to Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Home Guard Rules, 1962 for extending their services beyond the age of 55 years in 'reasonable cases' by laying down the conditions afresh in clear terms keeping in mind the observations made above. The needful be done within a reasonable period of at least six months. C. Till as such time the fresh policy/ scheme to the said effects formulated, the authority concerned shall exercise the powers of relaxation strictly in terms of the Circular dated 21.07.2010."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of
the petitioner may be considered afresh in terms of the policy to
be decided by the respondents in lieu of para B as quoted from
the aforesaid judgment.
4. In light of the aforesaid observations, the present writ
petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent to
consider the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with the
aforesaid judgment and the compliance made in lieu thereof by
the respondent.
(FARJAND ALI),J 61-Samvedana/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!