Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Moola Ram Chaudhary vs Amraram And Ors (2024:Rj-Jd:37895)
2024 Latest Caselaw 7989 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7989 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Moola Ram Chaudhary vs Amraram And Ors (2024:Rj-Jd:37895) on 11 September, 2024

Author: Birendra Kumar

Bench: Birendra Kumar

[2024:RJ-JD:37895]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
             S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 650/2005

Moola Ram Chaudhary s/o Shri Nagu Ram Chaudhary, R/o
Village-Bayard, Tehsil Merta City, District Nagaur.
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.    Amraram s/o Shri Heeraram by caste Jat, R/o Bayard, Tehsil
Merta City District Nagaur.
2.   Pukharam s/o Shri Heeraram by caste Jat, R/o Bayard, Tehsil
Merta City district Nagaur.
3.     State of Rajasthan
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     None.
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP.



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR

Order

11/09/2024

1. No one appears for the petitioner.

2. In this criminal revision, judgment dated 19.4.2005, passed

in Criminal Appeal No. 2/2004 (7/2003) has been challenged

whereby respondent no. 1 was acquitted of offence under Section

326/34 IPC and respondent no. 2 was acquitted of offence under

Section 326 IPC. Respondent no. 2 was convicted for offence

under Section 323, 324 IPC and respondent no. 1 was convicted

for offence under Section 323, 324/34 IPC. The respondents have

been allowed the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act. Since

no previous conviction is on the record, there is no rider to not to

consider the case of respondent nos. 1 and 2 for grant of benefit

of the Probation of Offenders Act. Nothing else is there to interfere

with the judgment.

[2024:RJ-JD:37895] (2 of 2) [CRLR-650/2005]

3. Hence, this criminal revision petition stands dismissed as

devoid of any merit.

(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J 9-sumer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter