Monika vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 7961 Raj

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Monika vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 11 September, 2024

Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur

Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur

[2024:RJ-JD:37800]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14981/2024

1.       Monika W/o Kamal Kishore Chanwariya, Aged About 28
         Years, R/o Goga Gate Valmiki Basti, Bandra Bass, Bikaner,
         Rajasthan.
2.       Sanjay Kumar S/o Sundar Lal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o
         Koriyo Ka Mohalla, Gajner Road, Ramrahim Galli, Bikaner.
                                                                      ----Petitioners
                                        Versus
1.       The    State      Of     Rajasthan,         Through        The   Secretary,
         Department Of Local Self Government, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Bikaner, District Bikaner,
         Rajasthan.
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Sanjay Raj Pandit
                                   Mr. Manish Barasa
For Respondent(s)            :     --



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

11/09/2024

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to

withdraw the present petition in light of the directions given by the

Division Bench of this Court vide its order dated 09.08.2019

rendered in D.B. Special Appeal No.1733/2018 : Virendra

Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

2. Permission granted.

3. The present petition is permitted to be withdrawn.

4. The petitioners would be free to file a representation before

the respondents within a period of two weeks from today.

[2024:RJ-JD:37800] (2 of 2) [CW-14981/2024]

5. In case, the representation is so addressed along with a

certified copy of the order instant, the respondents shall consider

petitioners' grievances in accordance with law including the

judgment passed by Division Bench in the case of Virendra

Kumar (supra).

6. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievances. The same may not

be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

7. The writ petition so also the stay application stand dismissed

accordingly.

8. The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,

the averments made therein are found to be correct, the

petitioners would be entitled to the relief.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 69-/Vivek/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)