Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rameshwari vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:37686)
2024 Latest Caselaw 7919 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7919 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 September, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Rameshwari vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:37686) on 10 September, 2024

[2024:RJ-JD:37686]

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                        JODHPUR
                 S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5667/2024

Rameshwari W/o Hukmi Chand, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Badi
Khatu, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur (Raj).
                                                                             ----Petitioner
                                             Versus
1.       State        Of    Rajasthan,         Through         Its      Secretary,       Home
         Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer Range, Ajmer.
3.       Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur (Raj)
4.       Station House Officer, Police Station Badi Khatu, District
         Nagaur.(Raj)
                                                                          ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)                  :    Mr. B.R. Chahar.
For Respondent(s)                  :    Ms. Sonu Manawat, P.P.


                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Order

10/09/2024

1. Dissatisfied with the progress and manner of the

investigation, the petitioner/complainant seeks issuance of

directions to the respondents to conduct a fair

inquiry/investigation regarding FIR No.84/2023 dated 02.07.2023,

registered under Sections 147, 447, 427, 323 & 308 of IPC, at

Police Station Badi Khatu, District Nagaur.

2. Heard.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the

investigating agency is not proceeding in a fair and just manner

and is intentionally stalling the investigation after registration of

FIR.

[2024:RJ-JD:37686] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5667/2024]

4. Learned Public Prosecutor appears on service of advance

copy of the petition and accepts notice on behalf of the State. He

opposes the petition arguing that once FIR was registered, law will

take its own course.

5. Be that as it may, in my opinion, the petitioner ought to have

availed of other available legal remedies for redressal of his

grievance before approaching this Court. Ordinarily, in cases of

grievances arising from unfair or improper investigation of an FIR,

the aggrieved person can seek recourse by approaching a superior

police officer as per Section 36 of Cr.P.C (now Section 30 of

BNSS). If the grievance remains unaddressed, one can then

approach a Magistrate of competent jurisdiction under Section

156(3) of Cr.P.C. (now Section 175(3) of BNSS), who can seek

submission of a report by the police. Reference may also be had to

Apex Court judgment in Sakiri Vasu versus State of U.P. and

Others1.

6. In the premise, instant petition is disposed of with liberty to

approach the appropriate forum for redressal of grievance, as

aforesaid.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(ARUN MONGA),J 100-Sumit/-

1 2008 (2) SCC 409

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter