Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anjali Nahar vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:37101)
2024 Latest Caselaw 7814 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7814 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Anjali Nahar vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:37101) on 6 September, 2024

Author: Kuldeep Mathur

Bench: Kuldeep Mathur

[2024:RJ-JD:37101]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1904/2024

1.       Anjali Nahar D/o Anil Kumar Nahar, Aged About 25 Years,
         R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla Gela Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh,
         Rajasthan.
2.       Bilal Khan Pathan S/o Akbar Khan Pathan, Aged About 33
         Years, R/o Near Railway Station, Chanderiya, Chittorgarh,
         Rajasthan.
                                                                  ----Petitioners
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home
         Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Jaipur.
3.       Superintendent Of Police, Dist. Chittorgarh.
4.       S.h.o., Police Station, City Kotwali Dist. Chittorgarh.
5.       S.h.o., Police Station, Chanderiya Dist. Chittorgarh.
6.       Anil Nahar S/o Jitmal Nahar, R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla Gela
         Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
7.       Dinesh Nahar S/o Jitmal Nahar, R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla
         Gela Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
8.       Rakesh Nahar S/o Jitmal Nahar, R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla
         Gela Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
9.       Suresh Nahar S/o Jitmal Nahar, R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla
         Gela Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
10.      Akash Nahar S/o Anil Nahar, R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla Gela
         Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
11.      Deepak Nahar S/o Dinesh Nahar, R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla
         Gela Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
12.      Abhishek Nahar S/o Suresh Nahar, R/o Ashok Nagar
         Bichla Gela Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
13.      Chirag Nahar S/o Suresh Nahar, R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla
         Gela Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
14.      Anil Kothari S/o Lalchand Kothari, R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla
         Gela Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
15.      Indar Bafwna S/o Roshan Lal, R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla
         Gela Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
16.      Sushil Bafwna S/o Roshan Lal, R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla

                      (Downloaded on 09/09/2024 at 08:47:12 PM)
 [2024:RJ-JD:37101]                   (2 of 3)                      [CRLW-1904/2024]


         Gela Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
17.      Anil Bafwna S/o Roshan Lal, R/o Ashok Nagar Bichla Gela
         Hanuman Marg, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
18.      Akbar Khan S/o Chotu Khan, R/o Near Railway Station,
         Chanderiya, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
19.      Mushtak Khan S/o Akbar Khan, R/o Near Railway Station,
         Chanderiya, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
20.      Mansukih Khan S/o Chotu Khan, R/o Near Railway
         Station, Chanderiya, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
21.      Anisha Baig W/o Akbar Khan, R/o Near Railway Station,
         Chanderiya, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
22.      Suniya W/o Mustak Khan, R/o Near Railway Station,
         Chanderiya, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :    Mr. Shivraj Chauhan
For Respondent(s)          :    Mr. N.K. Gurjar, GA-cum-AAG



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

06/09/2024

The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live

in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other

against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at

the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The

petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent

authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection

but no heed has been paid to their request so far.

[2024:RJ-JD:37101] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1904/2024]

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in

relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the

judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522,

the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned

respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners

deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 130-himanshu/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter