Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7810 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:36992]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13798/2024
Neetu Mangnani D/o Atma Ram Mangnani, Aged About 38 Years,
2/143 Housing Board Colony Sikar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary
School Education Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-Cum
Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Director, Elementary Education Department,
Rajasthan, Bikaner.
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Barmer.
5. The District Education Officer (H.Q), Elementary
Education Barmer.
6. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Churu.
7. The District Education Officer (H.Q), Elementary
Education, Churu.
8. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti
Sujangarh District Churu.
9. The Principal Cum Peeo, Govt. Senior Secondary School
Mundho Ki Dhani District Barmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla for
Mr. Sandeep Kalwaniya
For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.L. Bhati, AAG with
Mr. Deepak Chandak, AAAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
06/09/2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the
material available on record.
[2024:RJ-JD:36992] (2 of 3) [CW-13798/2024]
2. The controversy involved in the writ petition is squarely
covered by a judgment passed by co-ordinate Bench of this
Court in the case of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12846/2017
(Dhanraj Meena vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided
on 15.1.2018. In the aforesaid matter, following directions
were issued to the respondents:-
"In view of the specific provision i.e. second proviso to Rule 24 of RSR as well as the judgment of this Court in the case of Praveen Kumar Yadav (supra) and Chandra Kala Saini (supra), the stand taken by the respondents in orders dated 2.9.2015 (Annex.R/1) and 4.12.2017 (Annex.R/2), is without any basis.
In view thereof, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are allowed, as the petitioners have already been relieved pursuant to the interim orders passed by this Court, the said interim orders passed by this Court directing to relieve the petitioners are made absolute.
It is further directed that the respondents while dealing with the cases of the petitioners pertaining to their pay fixation etc. would follow the provisions of Rules 24 and 26 of the RSR as per law.
In cases where the petitioners have been relieved provisionally under the directions of this Court, the Authorities would pass appropriate orders pertaining to relieving of the petitioners alongwith their last pay certificate (L.P.C.), where they were serving earlier."
3. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case,
the instant writ petition is allowed with a direction that the
petitioner shall be relieved from her present place of posting
[2024:RJ-JD:36992] (3 of 3) [CW-13798/2024]
i.e. Government Primary School, Nagnesiya Mandir Mundho
Ki Dhani, District Barmer for joining in Government Upper
Primary School, Tharda Bobasar, Bidavtan Block Sujangarh,
District Churu in pursuance of the appointment order dated
25.07.2024 (Annexure-4). Relieving order in favour of the
petitioner shall be issued within a period of seven days from
today.
4. Petitioner will be permitted to join duties at Government
Upper Primary School, Tharda Bobasar, Bidavtan Block
Sujangarh on or before 17.09.2024.
5. The stay petition is disposed of.
(FARJAND ALI),J
44-Ashutosh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!